What is the best way to decrease the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure in a patient undergoing extended right hepatectomy with a future remnant liver volume to total liver volume ratio of 0.19?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Optimizing Future Liver Remnant to Prevent Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is the best intervention to decrease risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure in a patient with future remnant liver volume to total liver volume ratio of 0.19 undergoing extended right hepatectomy. 1

Assessment of Risk

The patient's future remnant liver volume to total liver volume (FLR/TLV) ratio of 0.19 is significantly below the safe threshold for major hepatectomy:

  • For patients with normal liver parenchyma, a minimum FLR/TLV ratio of 20% is recommended 1
  • For patients with chronic liver disease, a minimum FLR/TLV ratio of 30-40% is required 1
  • The patient's current ratio (19%) indicates high risk for post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), especially with extended right hepatectomy 2

Volume Optimization Strategies

First-Line Approach: Portal Vein Embolization (PVE)

  • PVE redirects portal blood flow toward the future liver remnant, inducing hypertrophy in the segments that will remain after surgery 1
  • The embolized portion of the liver undergoes atrophy while the FLR grows 1
  • PVE is considered the safest and most established technique for FLR augmentation 1
  • Typically requires 4-8 weeks for adequate hypertrophy before proceeding with resection 1

Alternative Approaches (if PVE insufficient):

  1. Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS)

    • More rapid hypertrophy than PVE alone 1
    • However, carries significantly higher morbidity (73% vs 59%) and mortality (14% vs 7%) compared to PVE 1
    • Should be reserved for cases where PVE fails to achieve adequate hypertrophy 1
  2. Two-Stage Hepatectomy with Portal Vein Ligation (PVL)

    • Alternative to PVE when anatomically appropriate 1
    • May be considered if percutaneous access for PVE is technically challenging 1
  3. Yttrium-90 Radioembolization

    • Can induce contralateral hypertrophy while simultaneously treating tumors 1
    • Less established than PVE for FLR augmentation 1

Monitoring Response to Volume Optimization

  • Follow-up CT/MRI volumetry should be performed 3-4 weeks after PVE 1
  • Target FLR/TLV ratio should be ≥30% before proceeding with extended right hepatectomy 1, 2
  • For high-risk patients (diabetes, cirrhosis), even a 30% FLR may be insufficient - consider targeting 40% 2
  • Consider additional functional assessment with indocyanine green retention test 1, 3

Perioperative Considerations

  • Minimize intraoperative blood loss through judicious use of intermittent Pringle maneuver 1
  • Avoid excessive and prolonged portal inflow occlusion which can impair hepatocyte function and regeneration 1
  • Consider FLR/body weight ratio - values <0.65% are associated with significantly higher PHLF risk 4

Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Volume does not always correlate with function - functional assessment should complement volumetric analysis 3
  • Diabetes mellitus significantly increases PHLF risk even with adequate remnant volume 5
  • Failure of FLR to hypertrophy after PVE may indicate underlying parenchymal disease and should prompt reconsideration of surgical approach 1
  • PHLF can occur despite adequate FLR volume if there are other risk factors such as excessive blood loss, sepsis, or hemodynamic instability 1

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.