Why was 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHPC) removed from the market?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Why 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHPC) Was Removed from the Market

17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHPC) was removed from the market by the FDA in April 2023 due to lack of evidence that it reduces the risk of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth, following a confirmatory trial that failed to demonstrate efficacy. 1

Background and Initial Approval

  • 17-OHPC was initially approved by the FDA through an accelerated approval pathway based on a 2003 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network trial that showed a 34% reduction in recurrent preterm birth at <37 weeks gestation 2
  • The medication was recommended for women with singleton pregnancies and prior spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB), administered as 250 mg IM weekly from 16-20 weeks until 36 weeks gestation 2
  • The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) had previously endorsed 17-OHPC as the preferred progestogen for prevention of recurrent preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies and prior SPTB 2

Evidence Leading to Market Withdrawal

  • The FDA required a confirmatory trial (PROLONG study) as a condition of the accelerated approval, which took 9 years to complete 3
  • The PROLONG trial failed to demonstrate efficacy of 17-OHPC in preventing preterm birth:
    • Delivery before 35 weeks occurred in 11% of women given 17-OHPC versus 11.5% given placebo (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.71-1.26; P=0.72) 3
    • The neonatal composite index occurred in 5.6% of women given 17-OHPC versus 5.0% given placebo (RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.68-1.61; P=0.73) 3
  • An FDA advisory committee voted 9 to 7 in October 2019 to pursue withdrawal of 17-OHPC from the market 4, 3
  • The FDA officially withdrew approval for all formulations of 17-OHPC (both intramuscular and subcutaneous) on April 5,2023, including both brand name (Makena) and generic versions 1

Clinical Implications of the Withdrawal

  • SMFM agreed with the FDA determination and now discourages continued prescribing of 17-OHPC, including through compounding pharmacies 1
  • The FDA determined it would be inappropriate to delay the withdrawal to allow patients currently receiving 17-OHPC to finish treatment, as there was no evidence of benefit with continued treatment 1
  • Patients who were receiving 17-OHPC at the time of withdrawal were advised that the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research had not identified evidence of harm from discontinuation before 37 weeks of gestation 1

Current Alternatives for Preterm Birth Prevention

  • Vaginal progesterone is now being considered as an alternative for prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies 5, 6
  • SMFM recommends that discussion of vaginal progesterone for primary prevention of recurrent preterm birth should include a shared decision-making process 1
  • Cervical cerclage remains an option for women with a cervical length ≤25 mm at <24 weeks gestation 1, 5
  • Other strategies being explored include low-dose aspirin and interventions outside the progesterone-aspirin-cerclage paradigm 6

Lessons Learned

  • This case highlights challenges in pharmaceutical regulations in the era of accelerated FDA approval 3
  • The 17-OHPC story demonstrates the importance of confirmatory trials following accelerated approval and the need for rigorous evidence before widespread adoption of interventions 3
  • The withdrawal emphasizes the need for continuous reassessment of treatment strategies for preterm birth prevention based on the most current evidence 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.