What is the next step in managing an 84-year-old patient with stroke-like symptoms, a patent foramen ovale (PFO) diagnosed by agitated saline imaging on echocardiogram (echo), and Alzheimer's dementia?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of an 84-Year-Old Patient with Stroke-Like Symptoms, PFO, and Alzheimer's Dementia

For an 84-year-old patient with stroke-like symptoms, patent foramen ovale (PFO), and Alzheimer's dementia, antiplatelet therapy alone is recommended as the most appropriate management strategy rather than PFO closure or anticoagulation.

Age-Based Considerations

  • PFO closure is not recommended for patients over 60 years of age with stroke-like symptoms, as the benefits of closure are significantly smaller and the harms potentially greater in this population 1, 2
  • In older patients (>60 years), fewer cryptogenic strokes are caused by paradoxical emboli through a PFO, making the causal relationship between PFO and stroke less likely 1
  • Current guidelines specifically state that PFO closure is not recommended for patients with stroke who are aged >60 years 1

Evidence for Treatment Selection in Older Adults

  • Antiplatelet therapy is the recommended first-line treatment for patients over 60 years with ischemic stroke and PFO 2
  • Options include aspirin (75-325 mg daily), clopidogrel (75 mg daily), or a combination of aspirin and dipyridamole 2
  • The benefits of PFO closure have been demonstrated primarily in patients under 60 years of age in clinical trials, with limited evidence in older populations 2, 3
  • A recent analysis of PFO closure in older adults suggests that the anticipated effect sizes would be much smaller than in younger patients, requiring substantially larger clinical trials to demonstrate benefit 4

Risk-Benefit Assessment

  • Risks of PFO closure include:
    • Device or procedure-related adverse events (3.6% absolute risk) 2
    • Increased risk of persistent atrial fibrillation (1.8% absolute risk increase) 2
    • Transient atrial fibrillation (1.2% absolute risk increase) 2
  • These risks are particularly concerning in an 84-year-old patient with Alzheimer's dementia, where procedural complications and post-procedure management may be more challenging 1
  • The PASCAL classification system, which combines clinical and anatomical features to determine the likelihood that a PFO caused a stroke, would likely categorize this patient in the "unlikely" category due to advanced age 3, 5
  • Patients in the "unlikely" PASCAL category showed no benefit from PFO closure but had higher risks of procedure-related adverse events 5

Considerations for Patients with Dementia

  • The presence of Alzheimer's dementia adds complexity to management decisions, as:
    • Procedural risks may be higher due to challenges with cooperation during and after the procedure 2
    • Anticoagulation management may be more difficult due to potential medication adherence issues 2
    • The overall risk-benefit ratio must consider reduced life expectancy and quality of life impacts 1

Follow-up Recommendations

  • Regular assessment of medication adherence and tolerance 2
  • Monitoring for recurrent stroke symptoms 2
  • If recurrent events occur despite antiplatelet therapy, reevaluation of the treatment approach may be warranted 2
  • Consider evaluation for other potential sources of stroke, including atrial fibrillation, which is common in this age group 2, 5

Key Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Assuming that PFO is the cause of stroke-like symptoms in an elderly patient without ruling out other more common causes in this age group 1, 2
  • Pursuing invasive PFO closure in an elderly patient with dementia when evidence suggests limited benefit and increased risks 1, 2
  • Failing to consider the patient's overall health status, life expectancy, and quality of life when making treatment decisions 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.