Volume Responders in COPD
Volume responders in COPD are patients who have reduced FVC due to gas trapping causing a pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio ≥0.7, but after bronchodilator administration show a greater improvement in FVC relative to FEV1, decreasing the ratio to <0.7 and revealing previously undetected airflow obstruction. 1
Characteristics of Volume Responders
- Volume responders typically have greater degrees of airflow obstruction with lower FEV1, lower FEV1/FVC ratio, and higher residual volume at rest compared to non-responders 2
- These patients show discordant pre-bronchodilator (≥0.7) and post-bronchodilator (<0.7) FEV1/FVC ratios due to significant gas trapping that improves with bronchodilation 1
- Volume responders are characterized by greater dynamic airway collapse, assessed by the ratio of early to mid-expiratory flow 2
- They often have more severe disease characteristics, including greater hyperinflation and gas trapping 1
Physiological Mechanism
- Gas trapping in volume responders reduces FVC due to increased residual volume, which artificially elevates the FEV1/FVC ratio, potentially masking airflow obstruction 1
- Bronchodilators reduce end-expiratory lung volumes by allowing more volume to be exhaled, thereby improving inspiratory capacity 1
- These shifts in lung volumes arise from small improvements in flow enabling larger and clinically relevant improvements in volumes 1
- Reduced end-expiratory lung volumes improve the mechanical efficiency of diaphragm contraction, decreasing the work of breathing 1
Clinical Significance
- Post-bronchodilator testing is crucial to identify volume responders who would otherwise be missed using only pre-bronchodilator spirometry 1
- Volume responders are more likely to be found among patients with lower baseline FEV1 (e.g., <80% predicted) 1
- Approximately 3% of patients in large COPD cohorts are volume responders (PREN-POSTO pattern) 1
- Volume responders experience symptomatic improvement and reduced dyspnea even when there is little or no flow response measured by FEV1 1
Diagnostic Approach
- GOLD 2025 recommends using pre-BD spirometry to rule out COPD and post-BD measurements to confirm the diagnosis 1
- If pre-BD spirometry shows FEV1/FVC ≥0.7 but clinical suspicion of COPD is high, post-BD testing should be performed to identify potential volume responders 1
- Post-BD results close to the threshold (between 0.60 and 0.80) should be repeated to ensure a correct diagnosis 1
- The pre-BD FEV1 can be used as a guide to the probability that the individual may be a volume responder, as this is more likely with lower FEV1 measurements (e.g., <80% predicted) 1
Contrast with Flow Responders
- Unlike volume responders, flow responders show a greater FEV1 improvement relative to FVC which may increase FEV1/FVC from <0.7 pre-BD to ≥0.7 post-BD 1
- Flow responders (PREO-POSTN pattern) have an increased likelihood of developing post-BD obstruction during follow-up and require monitoring longitudinally 1
- Flow responses tend to decrease in more severe COPD, while volume responses become more prominent 1
- Nearly 50% of flow responders progress to persistent airflow obstruction over time, highlighting the need for close follow-up 1
Clinical Management Implications
- Volume responders benefit from bronchodilator therapy even when traditional FEV1-based reversibility criteria are not met 3, 4
- Changes in lung volumes after bronchodilator administration correlate better with exercise tolerance and symptom improvement than changes in FEV1 4
- Plethysmography can provide additional information beyond spirometry in identifying volume responders 5, 4
- The magnitude of volume responses correlates with the degree of baseline hyperinflation 4
Pitfalls and Caveats
- Relying solely on pre-bronchodilator spirometry may miss the diagnosis of COPD in volume responders 1
- Using only FEV1 to assess bronchodilator response may underestimate the clinical benefit of bronchodilators in COPD patients 2, 4
- The response pattern varies depending on COPD severity, with volume responses becoming more prominent in more advanced disease 6
- Despite GOLD recommendations, clinical practice shows that the presence of a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.7 has only a small effect (6% increase) on the probability of a COPD diagnosis being made 7