What is the HEART (History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk factors, Troponin) score used for in making clinical decisions for patients with acute chest pain?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

The HEART Score for Clinical Decision-Making in Chest Pain

The HEART score is a clinical risk tool for rapid stratification of patients with chest pain that predicts all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization, allowing clinicians to safely identify low-risk patients who can be discharged without further testing. 1

Components of the HEART Score

The HEART score consists of five components, each scored from 0-2 points, for a maximum total of 10 points:

  1. History 1

    • Highly suspicious: 2 points
    • Moderately suspicious: 1 point
    • Slightly suspicious: 0 points
  2. ECG 1

    • Significant ST-segment depression: 2 points
    • Nonspecific abnormalities: 1 point
    • Normal: 0 points
  3. Age 1

    • 65 years: 2 points

    • 45-65 years: 1 point
    • <45 years: 0 points
  4. Risk factors 1

    • ≥3 risk factors: 2 points
    • 1-2 risk factors: 1 point
    • No risk factors: 0 points
  5. Troponin 1

    • 3× normal limit: 2 points

    • 1-3× normal limit: 1 point
    • ≤ Normal limit: 0 points

Risk Stratification and Clinical Decision-Making

The HEART score categorizes patients into three risk groups: 1

  • Low risk (0-3 points): <1% risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 30 days, supporting immediate discharge 2, 3
  • Intermediate risk (4-6 points): ~11.6% risk of MACE, indicating need for admission and clinical observation 2, 4
  • High risk (≥7 points): ~65.2% risk of MACE, supporting early invasive strategies 2, 3

Clinical Implementation

The HEART score has been validated in multiple settings and offers several advantages:

  • Facilitates accurate diagnostic and therapeutic decisions without radiation or invasive procedures 2
  • Provides higher sensitivity (94.1%) and negative predictive value (98.1%) for 30-day MACE compared to other risk scores 5
  • Can be incorporated into chest pain pathways to safely decrease hospital admissions (21% relative increase in discharges of low-risk patients) 6
  • Helps emergency physicians achieve the acceptable miss rate of 1-2% for 30-day MACE recommended by the American College of Emergency Physicians 1

Integration with Other Assessment Tools

  • The HEART score can be used alongside high-sensitivity troponin testing in accelerated diagnostic protocols (ADPs) 1
  • Serial high-sensitivity troponin measurements at 0 and 1 hour, 0 and 2 hours, or 0 and 3 hours are recommended by the American Heart Association for risk stratification 7
  • For intermediate-risk patients with known CAD, stress imaging may be reasonable, while invasive coronary angiography is recommended for high-risk patients 7

Potential Pitfalls

  • Overreliance on a single parameter while ignoring clinical context should be avoided 7
  • Small fluctuations in troponin levels may reflect assay imprecision rather than acute cardiac injury 7
  • The HEART score may be less accurate in very early presenters where troponin elevation hasn't yet occurred 1
  • Serial ECG changes are crucial when the initial ECG is nondiagnostic 7

The HEART score has replaced older risk stratification tools like TIMI and GRACE scores specifically for evaluation of patients with chest pain in the emergency department setting 1.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2008

Guideline

Risk Stratification of Admitted Patients with Chest Pain

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.