What are the guidelines for a percutaneous (perc) test in a medical context?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) Guidelines

The PERC rule is a validated clinical decision tool that safely rules out pulmonary embolism in low-risk patients without requiring further testing when all eight criteria are met, avoiding unnecessary imaging and potential harm. 1

PERC Criteria Components

  • The PERC rule consists of 8 objective criteria that must all be negative to safely rule out PE 1:
    1. Age < 50 years
    2. Heart rate < 100 beats per minute
    3. Oxygen saturation ≥ 95% on room air
    4. No unilateral leg swelling
    5. No hemoptysis
    6. No recent trauma or surgery (requiring hospitalization in previous 4 weeks)
    7. No prior history of venous thromboembolism (VTE)
    8. No hormone use (exogenous estrogen)

Proper Application of PERC

  • PERC should only be applied to patients already determined to have low pretest probability of PE (using clinical gestalt or validated tools like Wells criteria) 2, 1
  • PERC should not be used as a general screening tool for all patients with respiratory symptoms 1, 3
  • When all criteria are met (PERC negative) in a low-risk patient, the post-test probability of VTE is <2%, making it safe to exclude PE without further testing 2, 4
  • Applying PERC to intermediate or high-risk patients may lead to missed diagnoses 1, 5

Clinical Performance and Safety

  • Meta-analysis data shows PERC has a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 22%, with a very low miss rate of only 0.3% when properly applied 1, 5
  • In a large multicenter validation study with 8,138 patients, PERC demonstrated a sensitivity of 97.4% and a false-negative rate of only 1.0% 4
  • Using PERC could safely avoid approximately 20-25% of diagnostic tests in appropriate patients 6, 4
  • Community hospital studies have shown PERC could reduce CT scans by 23% with a negative predictive value of 100% 6

Diagnostic Algorithm for Suspected PE

  1. Assess pretest probability using clinical gestalt or validated tools (Wells criteria) 2, 3
  2. For low pretest probability patients, apply PERC 2, 1
  3. If PERC negative (all criteria met): safely rule out PE without further testing 2, 1
  4. If PERC positive (any criteria not met): proceed with D-dimer testing 2, 3
  5. For D-dimer testing, use age-adjusted thresholds (age × 10 ng/mL) for patients over 50 years 2
  6. If D-dimer negative: rule out PE 2, 3
  7. If D-dimer positive: proceed to imaging (CT pulmonary angiography) 2, 3

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Applying PERC to patients with intermediate or high pretest probability is dangerous and can lead to missed diagnoses 1, 5
  • Using PERC as a standalone tool without first determining pretest probability is inappropriate 2, 1
  • D-dimer testing in PERC-negative patients leads to unnecessary imaging in about 15% of cases due to false positives 7
  • The prevalence of PE in different populations affects PERC performance - European studies have shown higher PE prevalence, potentially affecting rule safety 8, 7
  • In patients with comorbid conditions likely to cause elevated D-dimer, D-dimer testing has limited utility and should be bypassed in favor of direct imaging 3

References

Guideline

Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach to Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2008

Guideline

Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism in Low-Risk Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.