What are the most common indications for a Cesarean Section (CS) delivery?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Most Common Indications for Cesarean Section Delivery

The most common indications for cesarean section (CS) delivery include failure to progress/cephalopelvic disproportion, previous cesarean section, fetal distress, and fetal malpresentation. 1, 2, 3

Primary Maternal Indications

  • Failure to progress/Cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) - The most common indication (approximately 30% of all CS), occurring when labor fails to advance despite adequate contractions due to disproportion between fetal size and maternal pelvis 1
  • Previous cesarean section - Second most common indication (approximately 16% of CS), often performed to prevent uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies 1, 2
  • Failed induction of labor - When cervical changes do not occur after adequate attempts at induction, including use of prostaglandins and oxytocin 2
  • Maternal medical conditions requiring expedited delivery:
    • Severe cardiac conditions (pulmonary hypertension, significant aortopathy) 3
    • HELLP syndrome (Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, Low Platelets) 3
    • Acute fatty liver of pregnancy 3
    • Maternal cardiac arrest (should occur within 5 minutes) 3

Primary Fetal Indications

  • Non-reassuring fetal status/fetal distress - Third most common indication (approximately 15% of CS), performed when monitoring indicates the fetus is not tolerating labor 1, 4
  • Fetal malpresentation - Fourth most common indication (approximately 11% of CS), including breech, transverse, or oblique presentations 1, 4
  • Placental abnormalities:
    • Placenta previa (placenta covering the internal os) 2, 1
    • Placental abruption (premature separation of placenta) 1
  • Umbilical cord prolapse with sustained fetal bradycardia 3, 1
  • Fetal growth restriction with abnormal Doppler studies or other concerning features 5

Obstetric Emergencies

  • Uterine rupture - Accounts for approximately 4% of CS, constituting an obstetric emergency requiring immediate delivery 1
  • Pre-rupture conditions - Signs of impending uterine rupture (approximately 3% of CS) 1
  • Cord prolapse - When umbilical cord precedes the fetus, compromising blood flow (approximately 2% of CS) 1
  • Placental abruption - Premature separation of the placenta from the uterine wall (approximately 3% of CS) 1

Special Considerations

  • HIV infection - CS recommended for women with HIV-1 RNA >1,000 copies/mL near delivery time to reduce vertical transmission 3
  • Multiple gestation - Depending on presentation and number of fetuses 4
  • Maternal request - Increasingly common, though guidelines recommend CS be reserved primarily for obstetric indications 3, 6

Mode of Delivery Considerations

  • For early-onset fetal growth restriction with absent or reversed end-diastolic flow in umbilical artery, CS is recommended by 32-34 weeks 5
  • For abnormal fetal surveillance (abnormal CTG or ductus venosus Doppler), CS is indicated 5
  • Meconium-stained amniotic fluid alone is not an indication for CS 2

Surgical Technique Considerations

  • Standard approach involves transverse lower uterine segment incision 5
  • Classical (vertical) cesarean section may be needed in specific situations:
    • Preterm delivery with undeveloped lower segment
    • Dense adhesions
    • Placenta previa/accreta 7

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Performing CS solely based on estimated fetal weight of 3500g in diabetic patients is not supported by guidelines 2
  • Meconium-stained amniotic fluid alone should not trigger CS 2
  • Delayed decision-making in cases of true fetal distress with irreversible causes can worsen neonatal outcomes 3
  • Unnecessary CS increases maternal risks, including postpartum infections which are 5-7 times more common after CS compared to vaginal delivery 3

The decision for CS should be based on clear medical indications, with consideration of both maternal and fetal outcomes in terms of morbidity, mortality, and quality of life 2, 3.

References

Research

A cross-sectional study of indications for cesarean deliveries in Médecins Sans Frontières facilities across 17 countries.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2015

Guideline

Indications for Cesarean Section Delivery

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Indications for Caesarian Section for Delivery

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Classical Cesarean Section.

Surgery journal (New York, N.Y.), 2020

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.