What is the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound with Doppler (Digital Orthogonal Projection Imaging with Frequency Shift) for diagnosing ovarian torsion?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ultrasound with Doppler for Ovarian Torsion: Sensitivity and Specificity

Doppler ultrasound has a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 88% for diagnosing ovarian torsion, according to a meta-analysis of 7 studies with 845 patients. 1

Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound for Ovarian Torsion

Doppler Ultrasound Findings

  • Doppler ultrasound is considered a standard component of pelvic ultrasound evaluation for suspected ovarian torsion 1
  • Key Doppler findings in ovarian torsion include:
    • Absent flow or abnormal flow pattern in the ovarian vein (100% sensitivity in a prospective study of 159 patients) 1
    • Whirlpool sign (twisted vascular pedicle) with 90% sensitivity in confirmed adnexal torsion cases 2

Grayscale Ultrasound Findings

  • Grayscale ultrasound alone has a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 76% for diagnosing adnexal torsion (meta-analysis of 12 studies, 1,187 patients) 1
  • Important grayscale findings include:
    • Unilaterally enlarged ovary (>4 cm or volume >20 cm³) 2
    • Peripheral follicles (found in up to 74% of cases) 2

Important Clinical Considerations

Limitations of Doppler Ultrasound

  • Normal arterial blood flow does not rule out ovarian torsion, as torsion can be intermittent or partial 2, 3
  • In some studies, 60% of surgically confirmed ovarian torsion cases had normal Doppler flow 3, 4
  • Venous flow abnormalities are more sensitive than arterial flow for detecting torsion 2

Combined Approach

  • A combined transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound approach provides the most comprehensive assessment for suspected torsion 1, 2
  • In a study of 13 patients whose only abnormality was absent or abnormal ovarian venous flow with normal grayscale appearance and normal arterial blood flow, 62% had adnexal torsion or subtorsion 1

Alternative Imaging

  • MRI has 80-85% sensitivity for ovarian torsion and should be considered when ultrasound findings are inconclusive but clinical suspicion remains high 2
  • CT has shown sensitivity ranging from 90-100% and specificity of 85-90% in some studies, but is not recommended as first-line imaging 5

Clinical Implications

  • Early detection of ovarian torsion is essential as it may lead to adnexal necrosis and infertility if left untreated 1, 6
  • Ovarian torsion should be considered a clinical diagnosis that requires integration of imaging findings with patient presentation 3
  • The whirlpool sign on ultrasound is highly specific, with 90% of patients with this sign having adnexal torsion confirmed on laparoscopy 1

Diagnostic Pitfalls

  • Relying solely on Doppler flow can lead to missed diagnoses and delayed management 3
  • Diagnostic accuracy varies considerably among ultrasound operators (60-100% range) 7
  • Ovarian torsion can mimic other conditions such as urinary tract infections or appendicitis 2, 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Ovarian Torsion Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Diagnosis of Ovarian Torsion: Is It Time to Forget About Doppler?

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC, 2018

Guideline

Outcomes of Untreated Pregnant Intermittent Ovarian Torsion

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Sonographic diagnosis of ovarian torsion: accuracy and predictive factors.

Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2011

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.