What is the FDA approval status of Tezspire (tezepelumab) for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

FDA Approval of Tezspire for Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

Tezepelumab (Tezspire) has received FDA approval for the treatment of severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) based on significant improvements in nasal polyp size, nasal congestion, and sinonasal symptoms compared to placebo. 1

Efficacy Data Supporting Approval

  • In the WAYPOINT trial, tezepelumab demonstrated significant improvements in the total nasal polyp score (mean difference vs. placebo: -2.07) and nasal congestion score (mean difference: -1.03) at 52 weeks (p<0.001 for both) 1

  • Treatment with tezepelumab significantly improved loss of smell (mean difference: -1.00), SNOT-22 total score (mean difference: -27.26), and Lund-Mackay CT score (mean difference: -5.72) compared to placebo (p<0.001 for all) 1

  • Tezepelumab dramatically reduced the need for nasal polyp surgery (0.5% vs 22.1% with placebo) and systemic glucocorticoid use (5.2% vs 18.3% with placebo) 1

Mechanism of Action

  • Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal antibody that blocks thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), an epithelial cytokine implicated in the pathogenesis of both asthma and CRSwNP 2

  • TSLP plays a significant role in type 2 inflammation in both CRSwNP and CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) by activating myeloid dendritic cells and group 2 innate lymphoid cells 3

  • Tezepelumab inhibits both full-length TSLP and its functional cleavage products that are elevated in nasal polyps 3

Clinical Implications

  • Tezepelumab joins other biologics (dupilumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab) in the treatment algorithm for severe CRSwNP, particularly for patients who have failed conventional therapies 4

  • In patients with both severe asthma and CRSwNP, tezepelumab has shown improvements across multiple SNOT-22 domains (sleep, nasal, function, ear/facial, and emotion) 2

  • Tezepelumab may be particularly beneficial for patients with T2 inflammatory CRS, as it inhibits active forms of TSLP that drive this inflammation pathway 3

Position in Treatment Algorithm

  • Current guidelines recommend intranasal corticosteroids as first-line therapy for CRSwNP, with short courses of oral corticosteroids for exacerbations 5

  • Endoscopic sinus surgery is generally indicated when medical therapy fails to control symptoms or when there is severe nasal polyposis with obstruction 5

  • Biologics including tezepelumab are positioned for patients with severe, uncontrolled CRSwNP who have failed conventional therapies 1, 4

Comparative Efficacy

  • While direct head-to-head comparisons are limited, a comparative review suggests dupilumab may be the most effective biologic for CRSwNP, with tezepelumab now providing an additional option targeting a different inflammatory pathway 6

  • The WAYPOINT trial results demonstrate tezepelumab's robust efficacy in reducing polyp size, improving symptoms, and decreasing the need for surgery and systemic steroids 1

Safety Considerations

  • In clinical trials, tezepelumab demonstrated a favorable safety profile for the treatment duration 1

  • As with other biologics, long-term safety data in CRSwNP is still accumulating, and patient selection should consider comorbidities and potential risks 4

Clinical Pearls

  • Patients with both severe asthma and CRSwNP may particularly benefit from tezepelumab, as it addresses both conditions simultaneously 2

  • The significant reduction in need for surgery (0.5% vs 22.1% with placebo) suggests tezepelumab may help avoid invasive procedures in appropriate patients 1

  • The improvement across multiple symptom domains, including the often difficult-to-treat loss of smell, represents a meaningful clinical benefit for patients 1, 2

Related Questions

What is the most appropriate next step in management for a patient with allergic rhinitis, characterized by eosinophilia in nasal secretions and boggy nasal membranes?
What is the recommended antibiotic therapy for chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps?
What is the efficacy of biologics such as dupilumab (dupilumab), benralizumab (benralizumab), or mepolizumab (mepolizumab) in the treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP)?
What is the recommended treatment approach for patients with chronic sinusitis according to the CHEST (American College of Chest Physicians) guideline?
What is the best course of treatment for a 29-year-old patient with persistent nasal pain, difficulty breathing, and headaches, who has been diagnosed with chronic allergic rhinitis unresponsive to nasal corticosteroids (e.g. mometasone) and antihistamines (e.g. loratadine, fexofenadine), and is concerned about chronic sinusitis?
What is the recommended dosage and treatment duration of amoxicillin/clavulanate for a child with otitis media?
What type of orthotic is recommended for a sacral 3 (S3) fracture?
What is the dosage and treatment duration of amoxicillin (amoxicillin/clavulanate) for a 2-year-old child with otitis media weighing 36 pounds?
What is the diagnostic workup and treatment for a patient suspected of having Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA) with positive Proteinase 3 antibodies (PR3-ANCA)?
How long should an orthotic brace be worn for an S3 (sacral) fracture and when should follow-up X-rays be taken?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.