What are the clinical presentations and diagnostic approaches for suspecting multiple myeloma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Suspecting Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Presentations and Diagnostic Approach

Multiple myeloma should be suspected in patients presenting with unexplained hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, or bone lesions (CRAB criteria), particularly when accompanied by symptoms such as bone pain, fatigue, or recurrent infections. 1, 2

Clinical Presentations That Should Raise Suspicion

  • Bone pain or pathologic fractures: Multiple myeloma commonly presents with bone pain (especially in the back or chest) or pathologic fractures due to lytic bone lesions 1, 3
  • Fatigue or weakness: Anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dL or 2 g/dL below lower limit of normal) is a common presenting feature 2, 4
  • Renal problems: Elevated creatinine (>2 mg/dL) or reduced creatinine clearance (<40 mL/min) may indicate renal involvement 2, 3
  • Hypercalcemia: Serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL can cause symptoms like confusion, constipation, and dehydration 2, 4
  • Recurrent infections: Due to immune dysfunction from abnormal immunoglobulin production 5, 4
  • Neurological symptoms: May indicate spinal cord compression from vertebral involvement 1, 3

Diagnostic Approach

Initial Laboratory Tests

  • Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) with immunofixation: To detect and characterize monoclonal protein (M-protein) 1, 2
  • Urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP): 24-hour urine collection with immunofixation to detect Bence Jones proteins 1, 6
  • Serum free light chain (FLC) assay: Essential for detecting light chain myeloma, particularly when standard SPEP is negative 6, 4
  • Complete blood count: To evaluate for anemia 1, 2
  • Serum creatinine and calcium levels: To assess for renal insufficiency and hypercalcemia 1, 2
  • Quantitative immunoglobulins: Measurement of IgG, IgA, and IgM levels 1, 2

Bone Marrow Evaluation

  • Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy: Required to confirm ≥10% clonal plasma cells 1, 4
  • Immunohistochemistry or flow cytometry: To confirm clonality of plasma cells 6, 3
  • Cytogenetic/FISH studies: To identify high-risk features like del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), gain 1q, or p53 mutations 1, 4

Imaging Studies

  • Skeletal survey: X-rays of spine, pelvis, skull, humeri, and femurs to detect lytic bone lesions 1, 2
  • Advanced imaging: MRI or CT scan for symptomatic bony sites even if skeletal survey is negative 1, 6
  • MRI of spine: Recommended when spinal cord compression is suspected 1, 3

Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma is diagnosed when the following criteria are met:

  • ≥10% clonal plasma cells on bone marrow examination or a biopsy-proven plasmacytoma 1, 4
  • Evidence of end-organ damage (CRAB criteria) attributable to the plasma cell disorder 1, 2

Additionally, multiple myeloma can be diagnosed in the absence of CRAB features if any of the following are present:

  • Bone marrow clonal plasmacytosis ≥60% 3, 4
  • Serum involved/uninvolved free light chain ratio ≥100 (provided involved FLC is ≥100 mg/L) 3, 4
  • More than one focal lesion on MRI 3, 4

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Failing to differentiate between MGUS, smoldering myeloma, and symptomatic multiple myeloma: MGUS has <3 g/dL monoclonal protein, <10% bone marrow plasma cells, and no CRAB features 2, 7
  • Missing light chain myeloma: Always perform serum free light chain assay when suspecting myeloma, especially with negative SPEP 6, 7
  • Overlooking renal involvement: Renal insufficiency can be the first manifestation of myeloma 2, 3
  • Attributing bone pain to other causes: Consider myeloma in older patients with unexplained bone pain 5, 4
  • Incomplete imaging: Conventional skeletal survey may miss lesions that would be detected by MRI or CT 1, 6

Risk Stratification

Once diagnosed, multiple myeloma should be risk-stratified based on cytogenetic findings:

  • High-risk: del(17p), t(14;16), t(14;20), gain 1q, del 1p, or p53 mutation 3, 4
  • Double-hit myeloma: Presence of any two high-risk factors 3, 4
  • Triple-hit myeloma: Presence of three or more high-risk factors 3, 4

Risk stratification is crucial for determining appropriate treatment approaches and prognosis 3, 4.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Workup and Treatment Approach for Multiple Myeloma vs MGUS

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Multiple myeloma: from diagnosis to treatment.

Australian family physician, 2013

Guideline

Diagnostic and Treatment Approach for Multiple Myeloma with Negative Serum Paraprotein

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Tests and Monitoring Strategies for MGUS

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.