Apixaban vs. Enoxaparin for Acute DVT Treatment
Apixaban is preferred over enoxaparin for the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in non-cancer patients due to its comparable efficacy, significantly lower bleeding risk, and greater convenience of oral administration. 1, 2
Efficacy Comparison
- Apixaban has been shown to be non-inferior to conventional therapy (enoxaparin followed by warfarin) for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) including DVT 1, 2
- In the AMPLIFY trial, the primary efficacy outcome of recurrent symptomatic VTE or VTE-related death occurred in 2.3% of patients in the apixaban group compared to 2.7% in the conventional therapy group (relative risk 0.84; 95% CI 0.60-1.18) 2, 3
- The AMPLIFY-J study in Japanese patients with acute PE/DVT showed similar efficacy between apixaban and UFH/warfarin with no recurrent VTE in the apixaban group 4
Safety Profile
- Major bleeding occurred significantly less frequently with apixaban (0.6%) compared to conventional therapy (1.8%) in the AMPLIFY trial (relative risk 0.31; 95% CI 0.17-0.55; p<0.001) 2, 3
- The composite outcome of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding was also significantly lower with apixaban (4.3%) compared to conventional therapy (9.7%) (relative risk 0.44; 95% CI 0.36-0.55; p<0.001) 2, 3
- The AMPLIFY-J study confirmed this safety advantage, with lower rates of major/clinically relevant non-major bleeding in the apixaban group (7.5%) compared to UFH/warfarin (28.2%) 4
Dosing and Administration
- Apixaban is administered orally at a dose of 10 mg twice daily for 7 days, followed by 5 mg twice daily for at least 6 months 1, 2
- Enoxaparin requires subcutaneous injections (typically 1 mg/kg twice daily), which is less convenient for patients 2, 3
- The fixed-dose regimen of apixaban eliminates the need for routine coagulation monitoring and dose adjustments that are required with warfarin following enoxaparin 1, 2
Special Populations
Cancer Patients
- For patients with DVT and active cancer, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) such as enoxaparin is still suggested over apixaban (Grade 2C) 1
- Limited data exists on apixaban use in cancer patients, with only 2.7% of patients in the AMPLIFY trial having active cancer 1, 3
- Ongoing trials like ADAM-VTE are specifically evaluating apixaban versus dalteparin (another LMWH) in cancer-associated VTE 5
Renal Impairment
- Apixaban should be used with caution in patients with severe renal impairment (CrCl <15 mL/min) as these patients were excluded from clinical trials 1, 2
- Approximately 27% of apixaban is eliminated renally, making dose adjustments less critical compared to other anticoagulants with higher renal clearance 1, 6
Guideline Recommendations
- The 2016 CHEST guidelines suggest using a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) such as apixaban in preference to vitamin K antagonist therapy for the initial and long-term treatment of VTE in patients without cancer 1
- This recommendation is based on less bleeding with DOACs and greater convenience for patients and healthcare providers 1
- The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines also support the use of DOACs like apixaban for the treatment of acute DVT 1
Clinical Considerations
- Apixaban does not require initial parenteral anticoagulation, unlike some other DOACs such as dabigatran and edoxaban 1
- The convenience of oral administration may improve patient adherence compared to injectable enoxaparin 1, 2
- Apixaban has been studied in upper extremity DVT with favorable safety and efficacy outcomes compared to LMWH/warfarin 7
Potential Limitations
- Limited data exists for apixaban use in certain populations such as patients >75 years old, those with extreme body weights, or severe renal dysfunction 8
- Cost considerations may impact treatment decisions, as apixaban may be more expensive than enoxaparin in some healthcare systems 1
- Reversal options for apixaban in case of emergency bleeding are evolving, with andexanet alfa now available but requiring further study 8