Should a 3-view or 4-view (posteroanterior (PA), lateral, oblique, and scaphoid view) X-ray be used for initial wrist assessment?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

4-View Wrist X-ray Is Recommended for Initial Wrist Assessment

A 4-view wrist X-ray that includes posteroanterior (PA), lateral, oblique, and scaphoid views should be used for initial wrist assessment to maximize diagnostic accuracy and minimize missed fractures. 1, 2

Standard Radiographic Protocol for Wrist Assessment

  • The American College of Radiology (ACR) recommends that for patients with suspected distal radius fractures, a standard examination should include at minimum a 3-view series consisting of posteroanterior (PA), lateral, and 45° semipronated oblique views 1
  • However, research indicates that adding a fourth projection—a scaphoid view—increases diagnostic yield for both distal radius fractures and scaphoid injuries 1, 2
  • Relying on only 2 views is inadequate for detecting fractures in the joints of the extremities, especially those involving the wrist 1
  • The scaphoid view is particularly important as scaphoid fractures may be radiographically occult on standard views and delayed diagnosis is common 1, 2

Evidence Supporting 4-View Approach

  • A cadaver study determined that four specific views provide the most comprehensive visualization of the scaphoid: PA view in ulnar deviation, oblique view in 60° pronation, oblique view in 60° supination, and lateral view 3
  • In a survey of practice patterns, 64.3% of hospitals and 68.4% of consultant radiologists recommended four views for suspected scaphoid fractures, indicating this is the most common standard of care 4
  • The addition of a scaphoid-specific view helps visualize the scaphoid bone, which is particularly prone to occult fractures that may be missed on standard 3-view series 2, 5

Clinical Implications and Pitfalls

  • Missed wrist fractures, particularly of the scaphoid, can lead to significant morbidity including nonunion, avascular necrosis, and post-traumatic arthritis 1
  • If initial radiographs are negative but clinical suspicion remains high, options include placing the patient in a short arm cast and repeating radiographs in 10-14 days, or proceeding to advanced imaging such as MRI without IV contrast 6
  • A common pitfall is relying on too few views, particularly in cases of suspected scaphoid injury, which can lead to missed diagnoses and poor outcomes 4, 5

Special Considerations

  • For dynamic scapholunate instability assessment, both PA ulnar deviation and clenched fist stress views are equally effective in showing diastasis following wrist injury 7
  • In cases where initial radiographs are normal but clinical suspicion for fracture remains high, MRI without IV contrast or CT without IV contrast may be appropriate next steps 1
  • For chronic wrist pain evaluation, the standard radiographic assessment also includes 3 views (PA, lateral, and oblique), but may require additional specialized views depending on the clinical scenario 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

[Views necessary for the traumatic wrist].

Annales de radiologie, 1995

Research

Positioning of the wrist for scaphoid radiography.

European journal of radiology, 2007

Research

Scaphoid fractures: variation in radiographic views - a survey of current practice in the West of Scotland region.

European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine, 2007

Guideline

X-ray Imaging for Finger Fracture Evaluation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.