Counseling Patients on Breast Cancer Risk and When to Seek Medical Assessment
Women should be counseled about breast cancer risk through a shared decision-making approach, with regular risk assessment starting at age 25, and should be taught breast self-awareness to promptly report any breast changes to their healthcare provider. 1
Risk Assessment and Stratification
- Healthcare providers should periodically perform individualized assessment of breast cancer risk to guide screening decisions, with updates every 1-2 years, especially if family history changes 1
- Risk factors that increase breast cancer risk include:
- Older age
- Family history of breast cancer
- Older age at first birth
- Younger age at menarche
- History of breast biopsy 1
- Women can be stratified into normal risk and increased risk categories 1
- Women with any of these risk factors have higher breast cancer risk than average 50-year-old women:
- Two first-degree relatives with breast cancer
- Two previous breast biopsies
- One first-degree relative with breast cancer and one previous breast biopsy
- Previous diagnosis of breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ, or atypical hyperplasia
- Previous chest irradiation
- BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation 1
Breast Self-Awareness and Clinical Examination
- Women should be familiar with their breasts and promptly report any changes to their healthcare provider 1
- Formal breast self-examination (BSE) instruction is not recommended as it has not been shown to reduce breast cancer mortality 1
- Clinical breast examination (CBE) recommendations vary by risk category:
- Symptoms or positive findings requiring immediate medical assessment include:
- Palpable lump or mass
- Asymmetric thickening/nodularity
- Nipple discharge in absence of palpable mass
- Skin changes (peau d'orange, erythema, nipple excoriation, scaling/eczema) 1
Screening Recommendations for Average-Risk Women
- For women 40-49 years:
- Shared decision-making approach is recommended, discussing benefits and harms of screening 1
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends offering screening mammography starting at age 40 1
- American College of Radiology recommends annual screening beginning at age 40 2
- Canadian Task Force recommends not screening with mammography (conditional recommendation) 1
- For women 50-74 years:
- For women 75+ years:
When to Seek Immediate Medical Assessment
- Patients should be instructed to seek immediate medical assessment for:
Special Considerations for High-Risk Women
- All women should undergo risk assessment by age 25, especially Black women and those of Ashkenazi Jewish heritage 2
- Women with genetics-based increased risk (BRCA1/2 mutations) or calculated lifetime risk ≥20% should undergo:
- Annual breast MRI starting at ages 25-30
- Annual mammography starting between ages 25-40 (depending on risk type) 2
- Women with prior chest radiation at young ages should begin screening at age 25 or 8 years after radiation exposure 1
- Women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50 or with personal histories of breast cancer and dense breasts should undergo annual supplemental breast MRI 2
Common Pitfalls in Breast Cancer Risk Assessment
- Failing to update risk assessment when family history changes 1
- Overlooking high-risk women who need more intensive surveillance 3
- Applying average-risk screening recommendations to high-risk women 3
- Assuming low risk is protective - approximately two-thirds of women diagnosed with breast cancer under 50 are not "high risk" 4
- Overreliance on the Gail model, which has limitations in discriminating individual risk 1
Communicating Risk and Benefits of Screening
- Discuss both benefits (mortality reduction) and potential harms (false positives, overdiagnosis) of screening 1
- Explain that screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality by approximately 15% after 14 years of follow-up 1
- Emphasize that early detection through screening is one of the most important prognostic factors for survival 5
- Acknowledge that screening recommendations vary among organizations, reflecting different assessments of benefit-to-harm ratios 5