What is the appropriate emergency department workup for a 7-year-old patient with Down syndrome (Trisomy 21) presenting with abdominal pain?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Emergency Department Workup for a 7-Year-Old with Down Syndrome Presenting with Abdominal Pain

Ultrasound should be the first-line imaging modality for evaluating abdominal pain in a 7-year-old child with Down syndrome, followed by MRI or low-dose CT if ultrasound is inconclusive or unavailable. 1

Initial Assessment

  • Obtain vital signs including temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation to assess for signs of sepsis or shock 1
  • Perform rapid cardiopulmonary assessment to ensure hemodynamic stability before proceeding with detailed evaluation 2
  • Administer IV fluids if signs of dehydration or shock are present (20 mL/kg normal saline) 2
  • Provide appropriate analgesia early in the evaluation process 1

History and Physical Examination Considerations

  • Down syndrome patients may have atypical presentations of common conditions and may not reliably communicate pain 1
  • Assess for specific comorbidities common in Down syndrome that can cause abdominal pain:
    • Constipation (very common in Down syndrome)
    • Celiac disease (higher prevalence in Down syndrome)
    • Atlantoaxial instability (may present with referred abdominal pain)
    • Congenital heart defects (may present with abdominal symptoms) 1
  • Physical examination should be thorough but gentle, with special attention to:
    • Abdominal distension
    • Localized tenderness
    • Presence of masses
    • Signs of peritoneal irritation 3

Laboratory Studies

  • Complete blood count with differential to assess for leukocytosis 1
  • C-reactive protein (CRP) - elevated levels are a significant predictor of serious pathology requiring admission 4
  • Basic metabolic panel to assess electrolyte abnormalities and renal function 1
  • Liver function tests 1
  • Urinalysis to rule out urinary tract infection 5

Imaging Studies

First-Line Imaging:

  • Ultrasound of the abdomen should be the initial imaging modality 1
    • Benefits: No radiation exposure, no need for sedation, can identify common causes of abdominal pain including appendicitis, intussusception, and gallbladder disease 1
    • Limitations: Operator-dependent, may be limited by patient body habitus or bowel gas 1
    • Sensitivity for appendicitis in children with definitive results: 99% (range 84-100%) 1
    • Specificity for appendicitis in children with definitive results: 96% (range 71-98%) 1

Second-Line Imaging (if ultrasound is inconclusive or unavailable):

  • MRI without contrast if available and patient can cooperate 1

    • Benefits: No radiation exposure, high sensitivity (98%) and specificity (97%) for appendicitis 1
    • Limitations: Requires patient cooperation, longer scan time, may require sedation in younger children 1
  • Low-dose CT with IV contrast if MRI is unavailable or patient cannot cooperate 1

    • Benefits: Quick acquisition, high sensitivity (96-98%) and specificity (96-98%) for appendicitis 1
    • Limitations: Radiation exposure, though pediatric-specific protocols should adhere to ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle 1

Special Considerations for Down Syndrome

  • Higher incidence of gastrointestinal anomalies including duodenal atresia, Hirschsprung disease, and imperforate anus may complicate the clinical picture 3
  • Consider atlantoaxial instability which may present with referred abdominal pain 3
  • Patients may have difficulty communicating pain, making physical examination findings less reliable 1
  • Increased risk of celiac disease may present with abdominal pain 3

Decision Algorithm

  1. If patient is unstable (signs of shock, peritonitis):

    • Immediate surgical consultation
    • Fluid resuscitation
    • Consider CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast if surgical intervention likely 1
  2. If patient is stable:

    • Perform ultrasound as first-line imaging 1
    • If ultrasound is conclusive → Treat based on findings
    • If ultrasound is inconclusive or appendix not visualized:
      • Consider observation with serial exams if low clinical suspicion 1
      • Consider MRI if available and patient can cooperate 1
      • Consider CT with IV contrast if MRI unavailable or impractical 1
  3. If transfer to a pediatric specialty center is being considered:

    • If patient will be transferred regardless of imaging findings → Defer imaging to receiving institution 1
    • If imaging will determine need for transfer → Perform appropriate imaging 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Relying solely on physical examination findings, as children with Down syndrome may have atypical presentations 1
  • Underestimating the significance of tachycardia, which may be the only early sign of serious intra-abdominal pathology 1
  • Performing unnecessary radiation-exposing studies when alternatives are available 1
  • Failing to consider the higher prevalence of certain conditions in Down syndrome patients (celiac disease, Hirschsprung's disease, duodenal atresia) 3
  • Delaying surgical consultation when peritoneal signs are present 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Emergency management of acute abdomen in children.

Indian journal of pediatrics, 2013

Research

Common abdominal emergencies in children.

Emergency medicine clinics of North America, 2002

Research

Evaluation and management of acute abdominal pain in the emergency department.

International journal of general medicine, 2012

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.