What are the appropriate use criteria for echocardiography (echo-cardiography)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography

The Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for echocardiography provide a framework to determine when echocardiography is reasonable based on specific clinical scenarios, with indications classified as appropriate (median score 7-9), uncertain (median score 4-6), or inappropriate (median score 1-3). 1

Core Principles of Appropriate Use

  • A complete echocardiographic examination includes 2D/M-mode imaging, color flow Doppler, and spectral Doppler to evaluate cardiac structures and hemodynamics 1
  • Tests should be performed and interpreted by qualified individuals in facilities proficient in echocardiographic techniques 1
  • A complete clinical history and physical examination should be completed before ordering an echocardiogram 1
  • Cost considerations are implicitly included in appropriateness determinations 1
  • The "uncertain" designation should not be used as grounds for denial of reimbursement 1

Generally Appropriate Indications

  • Initial evaluation of cardiac structure and function when there is a change in clinical status 2
  • Evaluation of symptoms potentially due to suspected cardiac etiology (dyspnea, syncope, TIA, cerebrovascular events) 1
  • Initial evaluation of known or suspected valvular stenosis or regurgitation 1
  • Evaluation of hypotension or hemodynamic instability of uncertain or suspected cardiac etiology 1
  • Assessment of suspected complications of myocardial ischemia/infarction 1
  • Initial evaluation of left ventricular function following acute myocardial infarction 1
  • Re-evaluation of patients with severe valvular regurgitation with no change in clinical status 1
  • Evaluation of known or suspected adult congenital heart disease 1

Generally Inappropriate Indications

  • Routine (yearly) evaluation of asymptomatic patients with mild valvular disease and no change in clinical status 1
  • Routine (yearly) evaluation of asymptomatic patients with corrected congenital heart defects more than 1 year after successful correction 1
  • Evaluation of left ventricular function with prior normal evaluation within the past year in patients with no change in clinical status 1
  • Evaluation of isolated premature atrial or ventricular contractions without other evidence of heart disease 1
  • Initial evaluation for a murmur/click without symptoms/signs of structural heart disease 3

Clinical Scenario Categories

  • Cardiovascular symptoms: Chest pain, dyspnea, palpitations, syncope 1
  • Valvular heart disease: Initial evaluation and follow-up of native and prosthetic valves 1
  • Heart failure: Evaluation of ventricular function and potential causes 1
  • Cardiomyopathies: Diagnosis and classification of hypertrophic, dilated, arrhythmogenic, restrictive, and unclassified types 1
  • Perioperative evaluation: Assessment before non-cardiac surgery 1
  • Acute settings: Evaluation of chest pain, hypotension, respiratory failure 1

Special Considerations

  • For surveillance echocardiograms, the test should not be ordered simply because a certain period of time has elapsed 1
  • If a test can be assigned to multiple indications, it should be classified under the most appropriate one 1
  • Global CAD risk assessment should be considered when evaluating appropriateness for certain indications 1
  • Angina definitions are important for determining appropriateness: typical angina (substernal pain, provoked by exertion/stress, relieved by rest/nitroglycerin), atypical angina (lacks one characteristic), and nonanginal chest pain (meets one or none) 1

Implementation Considerations

  • It is neither anticipated nor desirable that all physicians or facilities will have 100% of their echocardiograms deemed appropriate 1
  • AUC are useful as educational tools for both echocardiography providers and referring physicians 1
  • Incorporation of AUC into echocardiography laboratory accreditation requirements encourages their use 1
  • The greatest opportunity to optimize echocardiography use is in improving individual patient decision making 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Using echocardiography for routine annual follow-up in stable patients with mild disease 1
  • Ordering repeat studies when there is no change in clinical status 1
  • Failing to consider the impact of test results on clinical decision-making or patient management 1
  • Using the "uncertain" designation as grounds for denial of reimbursement 1
  • Comparing echocardiography to other imaging modalities rather than focusing on whether it is reasonable for the specific patient scenario 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.