What are the diagnostic criteria for sepsis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Criteria for Sepsis

Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, with diagnosis primarily based on the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and clinical evidence of infection. 1

Primary Diagnostic Tools

  • The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is the gold standard for diagnosing sepsis-related organ dysfunction, evaluating respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal, and neurological function 1
  • The National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) is recommended for initial evaluation of sepsis risk, with scores ≥7 indicating high risk of severe illness or death 1
  • A score of 3 in any single parameter of NEWS2 may indicate increased risk from sepsis 1

Sepsis-3 Diagnostic Criteria

  • Documented or suspected infection is a prerequisite for sepsis diagnosis 1, 2
  • Organ dysfunction is determined by an increase in the SOFA score by ≥2 points from baseline 3
  • For simplified surveillance purposes, the CDC's Adult Sepsis Event uses electronic SOFA (eSOFA) criteria which include: 3
    • Vasopressor initiation
    • Mechanical ventilation initiation
    • Lactate ≥2.0 mmol/L
    • Doubling in creatinine
    • Doubling in bilirubin to ≥2.0 mg/dL
    • ≥50% decrease in platelet count to <100 cells/μL

Clinical Signs and Laboratory Markers

  • Common infection indicators include: 1, 2
    • Fever or hypothermia
    • Leukocytosis or leukopenia
    • Elevated C-reactive protein or procalcitonin
  • Organ dysfunction markers include: 1
    • Respiratory: PaO2/FiO2 <300, SpO2 ≤90%
    • Cardiovascular: systolic BP <90 mmHg
    • Renal: urine output <0.5 mL/kg/h
    • Hepatic: hyperbilirubinemia
    • Coagulation: thrombocytopenia
    • Neurological: altered mental status
  • Mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) has shown utility in detecting multiple types of organ failure in sepsis (respiratory, coagulation, cardiovascular, neurological and renal) 4

Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (SIC)

  • SIC is a specific complication of sepsis affecting the coagulation system 1
  • SIC diagnostic criteria include: 5
    • Platelet count: 2 points for <100 × 10^9/L, 1 point for ≥100 to <150 × 10^9/L
    • PT ratio: 2 points for >1.4,1 point for >1.2 to ≤1.4
    • SOFA score: 2 points for ≥2,1 point for 1
    • Total score ≥4 confirms SIC diagnosis
  • SIC represents an early phase of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in sepsis 5
  • Patients with SIC have higher mortality rates and may benefit from specific interventions 5

Two-Step Diagnostic Approach for Sepsis-Associated Coagulopathy

  • Step 1: Screen sepsis patients with thrombocytopenia (platelet count <150 × 10^9/L) using SIC diagnostic criteria 5
  • Step 2: If SIC is present, evaluate for overt DIC using ISTH overt DIC criteria 5
  • ISTH overt DIC criteria include: 5
    • Platelet count: 2 points for <50 × 10^9/L, 1 point for ≥50 to <100 × 10^9/L
    • Fibrin-related markers (D-dimer/FDP): 3 points for strong increase, 2 points for moderate increase
    • PT prolongation: 2 points for ≥6 seconds, 1 point for ≥3 to <6 seconds
    • Fibrinogen: 1 point for <100 g/mL
    • Total score ≥5 confirms overt DIC

Monitoring and Re-evaluation

  • Patients should be re-evaluated based on risk stratification: 1
    • High-risk patients: every 30 minutes
    • Moderate-risk patients: every hour
    • Low-risk patients: every 4-6 hours
  • Deterioration or lack of improvement should prompt re-evaluation of risk and management strategy 1, 6

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Relying solely on biomarkers without clinical context can lead to misdiagnosis; organ dysfunction is what separates sepsis from routine infections 2
  • No single biomarker is routinely recommended for sepsis diagnosis in current clinical practice 2
  • The SOFA score components may not be routinely recorded in all hospitals' electronic health record systems, limiting its utility for wide-scale sepsis surveillance 3
  • Delayed recognition of sepsis increases mortality; early identification allows for evidence-based interventions such as prompt antibiotics and goal-directed resuscitation 7

References

Guideline

Sepsis Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Pathologic Difference between Sepsis and Bloodstream Infections.

The journal of applied laboratory medicine, 2019

Research

MR- proADM to detect specific types of organ failure in infection.

European journal of clinical investigation, 2020

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Sepsis.

The American journal of medicine, 2007

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.