What are endolymphatic sac decompression and vestibular nerve section?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Endolymphatic Sac Decompression and Vestibular Nerve Section: Surgical Interventions for Ménière's Disease

Endolymphatic sac decompression and vestibular nerve section are surgical interventions for medically refractory Ménière's disease, with endolymphatic sac decompression being preferred as a first-line surgical option due to its lower risk profile and hearing preservation capabilities. 1, 2

Endolymphatic Sac Decompression

Procedure Overview

  • Endolymphatic sac decompression is a surgical procedure that aims to relieve pressure in the inner ear by decompressing the endolymphatic sac, which is thought to maintain hydrostatic pressure and endolymph homeostasis 3
  • The procedure involves surgical exposure and decompression of the endolymphatic sac to potentially relieve vertigo symptoms in Ménière's disease 1
  • Various modifications exist, including simple decompression, endolymphatic sac enhancement, and endolymphatic sac shunting, all with essentially equivalent therapeutic results 4
  • A newer modification called endolymphatic duct and sac decompression (DASD) includes decompression of both the endolymphatic duct and sac from the posterior cranial fossa to the labyrinthine block 5

Risk Profile

  • Considered a low-risk procedure with less than 2% incidence of complete sensorineural hearing loss 1
  • Rare complications include cerebrospinal fluid leak, facial nerve paralysis, vertigo, and wound infection 4, 1
  • The procedure is hearing-preserving, making it suitable for patients who still have usable hearing 4

Efficacy

  • Retrospective studies show vertigo control rates ranging from 78% to 90% 4, 6
  • Despite controversy regarding efficacy following the Danish Sham Surgery Study, the procedure has been widely adopted by the international neurotologic community 2
  • Newer techniques with wider decompression of the sac and surgical manipulation of the endolymphatic duct may improve outcomes 5, 2

Recovery

  • Typically classified as a "day case" or "short stay" procedure requiring 1-2 days of hospitalization 1
  • Complete physiological and psychological recovery may take several weeks to months 1

Vestibular Nerve Section (VNS)

Procedure Overview

  • Vestibular nerve section involves surgically cutting the vestibular portion of the eighth cranial nerve to eliminate vertigo while preserving hearing 4
  • The procedure aims to disconnect the abnormal vestibular input from the affected ear while preserving cochlear function 7

Risk Profile

  • More invasive than endolymphatic sac procedures, involving craniotomy 4
  • Complications include hearing loss (despite being theoretically hearing-preserving), facial nerve injury, postoperative headache, and risks associated with craniotomy such as bleeding, meningitis, and cerebrospinal fluid leak 4
  • Residual vestibular function may persist due to incomplete nerve section, as there is not a well-defined separation between vestibular and cochlear nerves 4

Efficacy

  • Vertigo control rates range from 78% to 90% in retrospective cohort studies 4
  • Considered very effective for abolishing vertigo in isolated cases 7
  • Hearing is theoretically preserved but may be lost due to complications such as opening of the vertical canal or disruption of blood supply 7

Comparative Considerations and Decision-Making Algorithm

When to Consider Endolymphatic Sac Decompression:

  • First-line surgical option for patients with medically refractory Ménière's disease 2
  • Particularly suitable for patients with:
    • Preserved hearing that should be maintained 4
    • No evidence of contralateral disease 4
    • Failed conservative measures and medical management 4

When to Consider Vestibular Nerve Section:

  • Should be offered only in select cases due to its invasive nature compared to other options 4
  • May be appropriate for patients with:
    • Active vertigo unresponsive to all other therapies 4
    • Usable hearing that should be preserved 4
    • No evidence of contralateral disease 4
    • Reasonable expectation of compensation following surgery 4
    • Drop attacks associated with Ménière's disease (though labyrinthectomy may also be considered) 4

Important Caveats

  • In bilateral Ménière's disease, endolymphatic sac surgery or vestibulotoxic drugs are advised rather than vestibular nerve section 7
  • For patients with fixed non-fluctuating hearing loss, vestibular neurectomy may be more appropriate than sac surgery 7
  • Patients should be evaluated with audio-vestibular function testing preoperatively to assess contralateral vestibular function, especially before considering ablative procedures 4

References

Guideline

Endolymphatic Sac Decompression: Risk Assessment and Efficacy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Recent surgical advances and continued controversies in medically refractory Meniere's disease.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery, 2023

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Sac-vein decompression for intractable Meniere's disease: two-year treatment results.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 1998

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.