Treatment for a Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) of 23%
A transferrin saturation (TSAT) of 23% is generally within normal range and does not require iron supplementation unless accompanied by other indicators of iron deficiency or specific clinical conditions.
Interpretation of TSAT Value
- A TSAT of 23% is above the threshold of 20% that is commonly used to define iron deficiency in most clinical guidelines 1, 2
- Normal transferrin saturation is typically considered to be between 20-50%, with values below 20% suggesting iron deficiency 1, 2
- TSAT represents the percentage of transferrin binding sites occupied by iron and reflects iron that is readily available for erythropoiesis 1
Clinical Context Considerations
- TSAT should always be interpreted alongside other iron parameters, particularly serum ferritin 1, 2
- In patients with chronic heart failure:
- In patients with chronic kidney disease:
When Treatment May Be Indicated Despite TSAT >20%
- In patients with chronic inflammatory conditions where functional iron deficiency may exist despite normal or elevated TSAT 1, 2
- In patients with heart failure who have symptoms of iron deficiency despite TSAT >20% 1
- In hemodialysis patients receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents who may benefit from higher TSAT levels 4, 5
Treatment Approach Based on Clinical Scenario
For patients without specific conditions requiring iron supplementation:
For patients with chronic kidney disease:
For patients with heart failure:
Monitoring Recommendations
For patients with borderline TSAT values (20-25%):
For patients with inflammatory conditions:
Important Caveats
- A single TSAT value should not be used in isolation to determine iron status 1, 2
- Diurnal variation in serum iron levels can affect TSAT measurements; samples should ideally be collected at consistent times 1
- In patients with inflammatory conditions, functional iron deficiency may exist despite TSAT >20% 1, 2
- Low TSAT (<20%) has been associated with increased mortality in certain patient populations, including hemodialysis patients 7 and those with primary myelofibrosis 8