What are the findings of a normal rectal (digital rectal examination) exam?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Normal Findings on Digital Rectal Examination

A normal digital rectal examination reveals normal sphincter tone at rest and with squeeze, no tenderness, no masses, and appropriate perineal sensation with intact anal reflex. 1

Key Components of a Normal Rectal Examination

External Examination

  • Normal perianal skin without evidence of fecal soiling, lesions, or abnormalities 1
  • Intact anal reflex when tested with light pinprick or scratch 1
  • No patulous opening of the anal verge during simulated defecation 1
  • No prolapse of anorectal mucosa during straining 1

Digital Examination

  • Normal resting tone of the anal sphincter segment 1
  • Appropriate augmentation of sphincter tone with squeezing effort 1
  • Normal puborectalis muscle that contracts during squeeze 1
  • No localized tenderness to palpation along the puborectalis muscle (which would suggest levator ani syndrome) 1
  • Normal ability to integrate expulsionary forces when asked to "expel my finger" 1
  • No palpable masses or abnormalities 1
  • No blood on the examining glove 2

Functional Assessment

  • Normal perineal descent during simulated evacuation 1
  • Normal elevation during squeeze aimed at retention 1
  • Ability to relax the pelvic floor muscles during simulated defecation 1
  • Coordinated function between abdominal pressure and anal relaxation during attempted defecation 3

Clinical Significance

  • A normal digital rectal examination is useful in ruling out many conditions but does not completely exclude pelvic floor dysfunction 1
  • Less than two findings of dyssynergia in a digital rectal exam has high sensitivity (83.2%) for ruling out rectal evacuation disorders 3
  • The ability to correctly identify normal anal tone is limited (approximately 64% accuracy among physicians), making the squeeze test potentially more valuable 4

Important Caveats

  • A normal examination does not exclude all pathology, particularly early or subtle conditions 1
  • The assessment of anal tone is subjective and has limited accuracy even among trained physicians 4
  • In trauma patients, a normal rectal examination rarely influences management decisions unless there are specific indications such as penetrating injuries near the lower gastrointestinal tract, suspected spinal cord damage, or severe pelvic fractures 2
  • Digital rectal examination should be performed carefully and possibly after obtaining imaging if there is suspicion of sharp objects or foreign bodies 1

Clinical Context

  • Digital rectal examination is an essential component of evaluation for various conditions including constipation, fecal incontinence, rectal bleeding, and suspected cauda equina syndrome 1
  • It provides valuable information about the integrity and function of the anal sphincter and pelvic floor muscles 1
  • A normal examination in conjunction with other clinical findings helps guide further diagnostic testing and management decisions 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Pretest and Post-test Probabilities of Diagnoses of Rectal Evacuation Disorders Based on Symptoms, Rectal Exam, and Basic Tests: a Systematic Review.

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2020

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.