What cephalosporin (a type of beta-lactam antibiotic) has anaerobic coverage?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Cephalosporins with Anaerobic Coverage

Cefoxitin is the primary cephalosporin with reliable anaerobic coverage, followed by cefotetan as an alternative option. 1, 2

Primary Options

Cefoxitin

  • Second-generation cephalosporin with established anaerobic coverage 1
  • FDA-approved for intra-abdominal infections, gynecological infections, and skin/soft tissue infections caused by anaerobes including Bacteroides species 2
  • Effective against many anaerobic bacteria resistant to some penicillins and other cephalosporins 2
  • Dosing: Typically administered every 6-8 hours intravenously 1
  • Has high stability in the presence of bacterial beta-lactamases, both penicillinases and cephalosporinases 2

Cefotetan

  • Second-generation cephalosporin with anaerobic activity 3
  • FDA-approved for intra-abdominal infections and gynecological infections involving anaerobes 3
  • Longer half-life (176 min) compared to cefoxitin (49 min), allowing for less frequent dosing (every 12 hours) 4
  • Despite higher protein binding (85% vs 50% for cefoxitin), free cefotetan serum concentrations at 12 hours post-dose remain higher than free cefoxitin at 6 hours post-dose 4

Clinical Applications

Intra-abdominal Infections

  • Both cefoxitin and cefotetan are recommended for moderate to severe intra-abdominal infections involving anaerobes 1
  • Particularly useful when Bacteroides species are suspected pathogens 2, 3
  • For polymicrobial infections with both aerobic and anaerobic components 1

Gynecological Infections

  • Both agents are effective for pelvic inflammatory disease, endometritis, and other gynecological infections 2, 3
  • When used for pelvic inflammatory disease involving potential Chlamydia trachomatis, additional anti-chlamydial coverage should be added 2, 3

Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

  • Effective for mixed aerobic-anaerobic skin and soft tissue infections 1
  • Particularly useful for animal and human bite wounds with potential anaerobic contamination 1

Antimicrobial Spectrum

  • Active against gram-positive aerobes (Staphylococcus aureus [methicillin-susceptible], Streptococcus species) 2, 3
  • Active against gram-negative aerobes (E. coli, Klebsiella species, Proteus species) 2, 3
  • Active against anaerobes (Bacteroides fragilis, Clostridium species, Peptostreptococcus) 2, 3
  • Not active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, MRSA, or Enterococcus species 2, 3

Practical Considerations

  • Cefoxitin requires more frequent dosing (every 6-8 hours) compared to cefotetan (every 12 hours) 4
  • For surgical prophylaxis in procedures with risk of anaerobic contamination, both agents are effective options 1, 2, 3
  • Neither agent penetrates the cerebrospinal fluid adequately for CNS infections 5
  • Dosage adjustment required in patients with renal impairment 5

Alternative Options

  • When cephalosporins cannot be used, alternatives for anaerobic coverage include:
    • Combination therapy with metronidazole plus another agent 1, 6
    • Amoxicillin-clavulanate (oral option with anaerobic coverage) 1, 6
    • Carbapenems (broader spectrum including anaerobes) 1

Limitations

  • Increasing resistance among Bacteroides species has been reported in some regions 7
  • Local susceptibility patterns should guide therapy choices 7
  • Neither cefoxitin nor cefotetan has activity against extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms 8

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.