What is the treatment for infections caused by gram-negative bacteria using cephamycins (e.g. cefoxitin, cefotetan)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Cephamycins for Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

Primary Recommendation

Cephamycins (cefoxitin, cefotetan) should NOT be used for infections caused by third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCephRE), and their use should be limited to specific susceptible infections where they remain active in vitro. 1

Evidence-Based Guidance

When NOT to Use Cephamycins

The 2022 ESCMID guidelines explicitly recommend against using cephamycins for 3GCephRE infections (conditional recommendation against use, very low certainty of evidence). 1 This represents the most current high-quality guideline evidence and should guide clinical decision-making for resistant gram-negative infections.

Appropriate Clinical Uses for Cephamycins

Cephamycins remain indicated for susceptible infections in the following scenarios:

Intra-Abdominal Infections

  • Cefoxitin and cefotetan are FDA-approved for intra-abdominal infections including peritonitis and intra-abdominal abscess caused by susceptible organisms (E. coli, Klebsiella species, Bacteroides species including B. fragilis, Clostridium species). 2, 3
  • For mild-to-moderately severe community-acquired intra-abdominal infections, cefoxitin can be used as single-agent empiric therapy when local susceptibility patterns support its use. 1
  • Clinical trials demonstrate 95-98% response rates for community-acquired intra-abdominal infections when organisms remain susceptible. 4

Gynecological Infections

  • Cefoxitin is specifically indicated for pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) as part of the regimen: cefoxitin 2g IM plus probenecid 1g orally, followed by doxycycline 100mg orally twice daily for 10-14 days. 1, 2
  • Both cefoxitin and cefotetan are effective for endometritis, pelvic cellulitis, and PID caused by susceptible organisms including E. coli, N. gonorrhoeae, Bacteroides species, and anaerobes. 2, 3
  • Critical caveat: Cephamycins have NO activity against Chlamydia trachomatis; appropriate anti-chlamydial coverage (doxycycline) must always be added for PID treatment. 2, 3

Other Susceptible Infections

  • Lower respiratory tract infections (pneumonia, lung abscess) caused by susceptible S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, E. coli, Klebsiella, H. influenzae, and Bacteroides species. 2
  • Urinary tract infections caused by susceptible E. coli, Klebsiella, Proteus species, and Providencia. 2, 3
  • Skin and soft tissue infections caused by susceptible staphylococci, streptococci, E. coli, and anaerobes. 2, 3

Dosing Considerations

Cefotetan offers a practical advantage with twice-daily dosing (1-2g every 12 hours) compared to cefoxitin's four-times-daily requirement (1-2g every 6 hours). 5, 4, 6 This represents a significant cost-saving and compliance advantage when both agents are equally effective. 4, 6

Critical Limitations

Resistance Concerns

  • Cephamycins should be avoided in settings with high ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae prevalence unless susceptibility is confirmed. 1
  • They have limited activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and should not be used for pseudomonal infections. 5
  • No activity against MRSA or enterococci (e.g., Enterococcus faecalis). 2

Comparative Activity

  • Cephamycins are less active against Bacteroides fragilis than clindamycin or metronidazole, though clinical differences may not be significant in mixed infections. 7
  • For severe infections or those with resistant organisms, carbapenems (meropenem, imipenem) remain the preferred agents. 1

Antibiotic Stewardship Considerations

The extended use of cephalosporins, including cephamycins, should be discouraged due to selective pressure leading to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae and MRSA emergence. 1 Their use should be:

  • Limited to pathogen-directed therapy when susceptibility is confirmed 1
  • Avoided for empiric treatment in areas with high resistance rates 1
  • Reserved for situations where narrower-spectrum alternatives are inappropriate 1

Surgical Prophylaxis

Cefoxitin and cefotetan are indicated for surgical prophylaxis in uncontaminated gastrointestinal surgery, vaginal hysterectomy, abdominal hysterectomy, and cesarean section. 2, 3 However, the 2024 WHO guidelines suggest cefazolin, cefuroxime, or ceftriaxone may be more appropriate first-line options for most surgical prophylaxis scenarios. 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.