Cephamycins for Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
Primary Recommendation
Cephamycins (cefoxitin, cefotetan) should NOT be used for infections caused by third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCephRE), and their use should be limited to specific susceptible infections where they remain active in vitro. 1
Evidence-Based Guidance
When NOT to Use Cephamycins
The 2022 ESCMID guidelines explicitly recommend against using cephamycins for 3GCephRE infections (conditional recommendation against use, very low certainty of evidence). 1 This represents the most current high-quality guideline evidence and should guide clinical decision-making for resistant gram-negative infections.
Appropriate Clinical Uses for Cephamycins
Cephamycins remain indicated for susceptible infections in the following scenarios:
Intra-Abdominal Infections
- Cefoxitin and cefotetan are FDA-approved for intra-abdominal infections including peritonitis and intra-abdominal abscess caused by susceptible organisms (E. coli, Klebsiella species, Bacteroides species including B. fragilis, Clostridium species). 2, 3
- For mild-to-moderately severe community-acquired intra-abdominal infections, cefoxitin can be used as single-agent empiric therapy when local susceptibility patterns support its use. 1
- Clinical trials demonstrate 95-98% response rates for community-acquired intra-abdominal infections when organisms remain susceptible. 4
Gynecological Infections
- Cefoxitin is specifically indicated for pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) as part of the regimen: cefoxitin 2g IM plus probenecid 1g orally, followed by doxycycline 100mg orally twice daily for 10-14 days. 1, 2
- Both cefoxitin and cefotetan are effective for endometritis, pelvic cellulitis, and PID caused by susceptible organisms including E. coli, N. gonorrhoeae, Bacteroides species, and anaerobes. 2, 3
- Critical caveat: Cephamycins have NO activity against Chlamydia trachomatis; appropriate anti-chlamydial coverage (doxycycline) must always be added for PID treatment. 2, 3
Other Susceptible Infections
- Lower respiratory tract infections (pneumonia, lung abscess) caused by susceptible S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, E. coli, Klebsiella, H. influenzae, and Bacteroides species. 2
- Urinary tract infections caused by susceptible E. coli, Klebsiella, Proteus species, and Providencia. 2, 3
- Skin and soft tissue infections caused by susceptible staphylococci, streptococci, E. coli, and anaerobes. 2, 3
Dosing Considerations
Cefotetan offers a practical advantage with twice-daily dosing (1-2g every 12 hours) compared to cefoxitin's four-times-daily requirement (1-2g every 6 hours). 5, 4, 6 This represents a significant cost-saving and compliance advantage when both agents are equally effective. 4, 6
Critical Limitations
Resistance Concerns
- Cephamycins should be avoided in settings with high ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae prevalence unless susceptibility is confirmed. 1
- They have limited activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and should not be used for pseudomonal infections. 5
- No activity against MRSA or enterococci (e.g., Enterococcus faecalis). 2
Comparative Activity
- Cephamycins are less active against Bacteroides fragilis than clindamycin or metronidazole, though clinical differences may not be significant in mixed infections. 7
- For severe infections or those with resistant organisms, carbapenems (meropenem, imipenem) remain the preferred agents. 1
Antibiotic Stewardship Considerations
The extended use of cephalosporins, including cephamycins, should be discouraged due to selective pressure leading to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae and MRSA emergence. 1 Their use should be:
- Limited to pathogen-directed therapy when susceptibility is confirmed 1
- Avoided for empiric treatment in areas with high resistance rates 1
- Reserved for situations where narrower-spectrum alternatives are inappropriate 1
Surgical Prophylaxis
Cefoxitin and cefotetan are indicated for surgical prophylaxis in uncontaminated gastrointestinal surgery, vaginal hysterectomy, abdominal hysterectomy, and cesarean section. 2, 3 However, the 2024 WHO guidelines suggest cefazolin, cefuroxime, or ceftriaxone may be more appropriate first-line options for most surgical prophylaxis scenarios. 1