What are the percentages of oculomotor nerve palsy (ONP) resolution in coiling vs clipping for unruptured posterior communicating artery aneurysms?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Percentages of Oculomotor Nerve Palsy Resolution in Coiling vs Clipping for Unruptured Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms

According to the meta-analysis by Zheng and Chen, surgical clipping demonstrates significantly higher rates of complete oculomotor nerve palsy (ONP) resolution at 55% compared to 32% with endovascular coiling for posterior communicating artery aneurysms. 1

Resolution Rates by Treatment Modality

  • Surgical clipping achieves complete ONP resolution in 55% of cases versus 32% with endovascular coiling 1
  • Any degree of ONP resolution (complete or partial) occurs in 92% of clipped cases versus 74% of coiled cases 1
  • Multivariate analysis shows surgical clipping is significantly associated with ONP resolution of any degree with an odds ratio of 12.2 (95% CI, 3-49) 1
  • Complete ONP resolution with clipping has an odds ratio of 7.1 (95% CI, 1.8-28) compared to coiling 1

Factors Affecting ONP Recovery

  • Partial ONP at presentation is more likely to achieve complete resolution than complete ONP (OR = 4.2,95% CI 1.1-16) 2
  • Time interval from onset of ONP to intervention is a significant predictor of recovery (shorter intervals lead to better outcomes) 3
  • Patient age is a significant predictor of recovery (younger patients have better outcomes) 3
  • Longer follow-up duration correlates with higher rates of complete nerve recovery 4

Endovascular Coiling Outcomes

  • In a series of 20 patients with PCOM aneurysm-induced ONP treated with endovascular coiling:
    • 45% achieved complete recovery
    • 55% achieved partial recovery
    • No patients failed to show improvement 5
  • In another series of 37 patients treated with endovascular approaches:
    • 37.8% achieved complete ONP resolution
    • 51.4% achieved partial ONP resolution
    • Only 10.8% showed no signs of nerve recovery 4

Surgical Clipping Outcomes

  • Surgical clipping with or without additional oculomotor nerve decompression via aneurysm sac dissection shows similar outcomes 2
  • The initial severity of ONP is inversely associated with the likelihood of complete resolution after surgical treatment 2
  • Surgical clipping provides better long-term protection from aneurysm recurrence, which may be particularly important for younger patients 6

Treatment Considerations for Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms

  • For patients over 65 years of age, coiling is superior to clipping for internal carotid and posterior communicating artery aneurysms 6
  • For younger patients, clipping may offer advantages due to better long-term protection from rerupture 6
  • The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines note that for posterior circulation aneurysms, coiling is generally preferred over clipping 7

Limitations of Current Evidence

  • Most studies on ONP recovery are retrospective and have limited sample sizes 3
  • There is a lack of prospective randomized trials directly comparing clipping versus coiling specifically for ONP resolution 3
  • Long-term follow-up data on quality of life and cognitive outcomes after clipping versus coiling are limited 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.