How does UGT1A1 (Uridine Diphosphate Glucuronosyltransferase 1A1) polymorphism affect Irinotecan (Camptothecin-11) therapy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

UGT1A1 Polymorphism and Irinotecan Therapy

*UGT1A1 genotyping should be performed before initiating irinotecan therapy, with a 25-30% dose reduction recommended for patients homozygous for UGT1A128 (28/28) to reduce the risk of severe neutropenia while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. 1, 2

Impact of UGT1A1 Polymorphisms on Irinotecan Metabolism

  • UGT1A1 enzyme is responsible for glucuronidation of SN-38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan) to its inactive form SN-38G 3
  • The UGT1A1*28 variant, characterized by an extra TA repeat in the promoter region [(TA)7TAA instead of (TA)6TAA], results in reduced enzyme expression 3
  • Homozygous UGT1A1*28 carriers (*28/*28) have 50-70% reduction in enzyme activity compared to wild-type, leading to higher exposure to active SN-38 3
  • Heterozygous carriers (*1/*28) have approximately 25% reduction in enzyme activity 3
  • UGT1A1*28 homozygosity occurs in approximately 10% of North American population, with variable prevalence depending on race 3

Clinical Implications for Adverse Events

Neutropenia Risk

  • Homozygous UGT1A1*28 carriers have a 3.5-fold increased risk of severe (Grade 3/4) neutropenia compared to wild-type patients (38% vs. 9.8%) 3
  • Heterozygous carriers have a 1.8-fold increased risk (18% vs. 9.8%), though this increase is not statistically significant 3
  • The association between UGT1A1*28 and neutropenia is dose-dependent, with significant risk at irinotecan doses ≥150 mg/m² 3

Diarrhea Risk

  • The association between UGT1A1*28 and severe diarrhea is weaker than for neutropenia 3
  • Homozygous carriers have a 1.6-fold increased risk of severe diarrhea (27% vs. 18%), though this is not statistically significant 3
  • Heterozygous carriers have a 1.4-fold increased risk (27% vs. 18%), also not statistically significant 3

Tumor Response and Efficacy

  • At standard doses, homozygous UGT1A1*28 carriers show significantly higher tumor response rates compared to wild-type patients (70% vs. 41%, risk ratio 1.70) 3
  • This suggests wild-type patients may be relatively under-dosed at standard irinotecan doses 3
  • Heterozygous carriers show similar response rates to wild-type (45% vs. 41%) 3

Dosing Recommendations

For UGT1A1*28 Homozygous Patients (*28/*28)

  • FDA-approved irinotecan labeling recommends dose reduction for UGT1A1*28 homozygous patients 1
  • A 25-30% reduction in starting dose is generally recommended for these patients 2
  • The precise dose reduction is not definitively established; subsequent dose modifications should be based on individual tolerance 1

For UGT1A1*28 Heterozygous Patients (*1/*28)

  • For heterozygous patients, a more modest dose reduction (approximately 20%) may be considered, especially when using higher irinotecan doses 4
  • Close monitoring for toxicity is essential in these patients 1

Dose Considerations Based on Treatment Regimen

  • UGT1A1 genotyping may not be warranted for regimens using lower irinotecan doses (<150 mg/m²) 3
  • Testing is most valuable for regimens using irinotecan at doses ≥150 mg/m² or when combined with other myelotoxic agents 3

Clinical Utility of UGT1A1 Testing

  • Pre-therapeutic UGT1A1 genotyping improves patient safety and is likely to be cost-effective 2
  • No prospective studies have directly documented clinical outcomes when treatment is guided by UGT1A1 genotyping versus empirical treatment 3
  • UGT1A1 testing in patients who have already experienced irinotecan toxicity is not recommended, as they will require dose reduction regardless of genotype 3

Other Considerations

  • Other UGT1A1 variants such as UGT1A1*6 are also clinically relevant, particularly in Asian populations 5
  • Patients with Gilbert syndrome or elevated serum bilirubin should receive irinotecan with caution and at decreased doses 3
  • For patients receiving high-dose irinotecan with high risk of febrile neutropenia (≥20%), prophylactic use of colony-stimulating factors may be considered 3

Practical Approach

  1. Consider UGT1A1 genotyping before initiating irinotecan therapy, particularly for regimens using doses ≥150 mg/m² 3, 2
  2. Reduce initial irinotecan dose by 25-30% for UGT1A1*28 homozygous patients 1, 2
  3. Consider modest dose reduction (approximately 20%) for heterozygous patients, especially with higher-dose regimens 4
  4. Monitor all patients closely for neutropenia and diarrhea, with particular vigilance for homozygous patients 1
  5. Adjust subsequent doses based on individual tolerance 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.