Off-Label Treatments in Medical Practice
Off-label treatments are commonly used in medical practice when standard FDA-approved therapies have failed, when there is scientific evidence supporting alternative uses, or when treating conditions with limited therapeutic options, particularly in oncology, pediatrics, and rare diseases. 1, 2
Definition and Prevalence
- Off-label use refers to prescribing FDA-approved medications for indications, dosages, patient populations, or routes of administration not included in the FDA-approved labeling 3, 4
- The prevalence of off-label prescribing varies by specialty, with rates up to 40% in adults and as high as 90% in pediatric patients 5
- In oncology specifically, off-label use increased from one-third of cancer drugs in 1991 to between one-half and three-quarters by 2005, with only 27% of these uses supported by strong clinical evidence 1
Appropriate Scenarios for Off-Label Use
Off-label prescribing is generally appropriate in the following circumstances:
- When high-quality evidence supports the use despite lack of FDA approval 5
- When standard FDA-approved therapies have failed and patients have treatment-resistant conditions causing physical or psychological distress 2, 6
- In rare diseases where approved treatment options are limited or nonexistent 7
- In pediatric populations where many medications lack specific FDA approval 5, 7
- In oncology, particularly for advanced-stage cancers where treatment options are limited 1
- When an oral formulation is needed instead of an intravenous equivalent, even though the oral form may not have been formally tested in that specific setting 1
Evidence Requirements and Categories
Off-label use should fall into one of these categories:
- Use justified by high-quality scientific evidence 5
- Use within the context of a formal research proposal 5
- Exceptional use justified by individual clinical circumstances when no alternatives exist 5
Physician Responsibilities
When prescribing off-label medications, physicians should:
- Document thorough informed consent discussing the off-label nature of the prescription, alternative options, specific risks and benefits, and monitoring requirements 2, 6
- Determine whether available evidence justifies specific off-label uses and promote information-gathering when evidence is inadequate 3
- Discuss with patients the uncertainties accompanying off-label uses 3, 6
- Document the reason for off-label use in the patient's record 6
- Specify the intended duration of treatment and establish relevant monitoring protocols 2, 6
- Consider lower doses for off-label indications when appropriate (e.g., 0.3-0.5 mg/kg/day for isotretinoin in moderate acne versus standard dosing for severe acne) 2
Special Considerations by Field
Oncology
- Off-label use is particularly common in advanced-stage cancers 1
- Medicare covers oncology drugs listed in approved compendia, making off-label use more accessible for Medicare enrollees 1
- Oncologists select off-label treatments using FDA labeling, medical literature, published guidelines, drug compendia, and continuing education 1
Pediatrics
- Up to 90% of medications used in children may be off-label due to limited pediatric clinical trials 5, 7
- Special caution is needed as safety profiles may differ from adults 2
Rare Diseases
- Off-label prescribing is often necessary due to the limited number of approved treatments 7
- Post-hoc analysis rather than prospective trials may be more appropriate for evaluating treatments in rare conditions 1
Monitoring and Safety Considerations
- Baseline and ongoing monitoring should be established based on the medication's known adverse effect profile 2
- Patients should be monitored more closely than when medications are used for approved indications 6
- Drug interactions should be carefully evaluated before initiating off-label therapy 2
- Special populations (pediatric, elderly, pregnant women) require additional caution and monitoring 2
Ethical and Legal Implications
- Off-label prescribing is legal but carries ethical responsibilities 3, 4
- The medical community should self-regulate by determining whether available evidence justifies specific off-label uses 3
- Federal authorities should more closely monitor the effects of off-label prescribing 3
- Some countries, including the USA and France, have developed specific regulations regarding off-label use 4
Future Directions
- There is a need for a coordinated approach to evidence development for off-label uses, particularly in oncology 1
- Guidance is needed for trials performed in the post-approval environment to address questions relevant to patients, prescribers, and payers 1
- Australia's national health priority of Quality Use of Medicine and Medicine Safety aims to address off-label medicine use through stakeholder collaboration 6
- Drug repurposing (finding new uses for existing drugs) represents a formalized approach to identifying valuable off-label uses 7