When to order a computed tomography (CT) scan in patients with a chief complaint (c/o) of head trauma according to the Canadian CT Head Rule?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Canadian CT Head Rule for Head Trauma

According to the Canadian CT Head Rule, a CT scan is indicated in patients with head trauma who have a GCS score of 13-15 and any one of the following high-risk criteria: GCS <15 at 2 hours post-injury, suspected open or depressed skull fracture, signs of basilar skull fracture, vomiting ≥2 episodes, age ≥65 years, amnesia >30 minutes before impact, or dangerous mechanism of injury. 1

High-Risk Criteria (100% sensitive for neurosurgical intervention)

  • GCS score <15 at 2 hours after injury 1
  • Suspected open or depressed skull fracture 1
  • Any sign of basilar skull fracture (hemotympanum, raccoon eyes, Battle's sign, CSF otorrhea/rhinorrhea) 1
  • Vomiting ≥2 episodes 1
  • Age ≥65 years 1, 2

Medium-Risk Criteria (for brain injury detection)

  • Amnesia before impact >30 minutes 1
  • Dangerous mechanism of injury (pedestrian struck by vehicle, occupant ejected from vehicle, fall from height >3 feet or 5 stairs) 1, 3

Important Clinical Considerations

  • The Canadian CT Head Rule was originally developed for patients with GCS 13-15 with witnessed loss of consciousness, amnesia, or disorientation 1
  • The rule has been validated to be 100% sensitive for detecting injuries requiring neurosurgical intervention 4, 5
  • While the New Orleans Criteria has higher sensitivity for detecting any traumatic brain injury (97.7%-99.4%), the Canadian CT Head Rule offers better specificity (37.2%-39.7% vs 3.0%-5.6%) 1, 5
  • The Canadian CT Head Rule could potentially reduce CT scan usage by approximately 37%, while the New Orleans Criteria would only reduce scans by about 3% 1, 5

Special Populations

Patients with Minimal Head Injury (no LOC or disorientation)

  • The Canadian CT Head Rule has been validated in patients with minimal head injury (no loss of consciousness or disorientation) with 100% sensitivity and 29% specificity for detecting intracranial hemorrhage 6
  • Risk of clinically significant injury in minimal head trauma patients is very low 6

Anticoagulated Patients

  • Both the Canadian CT Head Rule and American College of Emergency Physicians guidelines recommend CT for all patients with coagulopathy (including those on anticoagulant medications) regardless of other criteria 1, 7
  • Anticoagulated patients have a significantly higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage (3.9%) compared to non-anticoagulated patients (1.5%) 7

Algorithmic Approach

  1. Assess GCS score (must be 13-15 to apply the rule) 1
  2. Check for high-risk criteria (requires immediate CT if any present) 1
  3. Check for medium-risk criteria (consider CT if any present) 1
  4. For patients on anticoagulants, proceed directly to CT regardless of other criteria 7
  5. For elderly patients (≥65 years), maintain a lower threshold for CT as age is a strong independent predictor of intracranial injury 3, 2

Comparative Performance

  • In validation studies, the Canadian CT Head Rule demonstrated 100% sensitivity for neurosurgical intervention with specificity of 60-76% 4
  • The Canadian CT Head Rule showed better performance than the New Orleans Criteria in a Japanese tertiary referral hospital study 8
  • An Austrian trial found that the Canadian CT Head Rule detected the need for neurosurgical intervention with 80% sensitivity and 72% specificity 2

Remember that while the Canadian CT Head Rule is highly sensitive for detecting injuries requiring neurosurgical intervention, it has lower sensitivity (83.4%-87.2%) for detecting all traumatic intracranial findings 1, 5. Clinical judgment should supplement the rule, especially in high-risk populations like the elderly and those on anticoagulants.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.