How to Interpret a Complete Blood Count (CBC)
The complete blood count (CBC) is one of the most commonly ordered laboratory tests and provides critical information about blood cell production, oxygen-carrying capacity, and immune system function that directly impacts patient morbidity and mortality.
Components of a CBC and Their Clinical Significance
Red Blood Cell Parameters
- Hemoglobin and Hematocrit: Evaluate oxygen-carrying capacity; abnormalities may indicate anemia, polycythemia, or dehydration 1
- Red Blood Cell Count: Quantifies the number of erythrocytes; abnormalities may suggest bone marrow disorders or blood loss 1
- Red Cell Indices:
- Reticulocyte Count: Measures immature RBCs; helps distinguish between production and destruction causes of anemia 1
White Blood Cell Parameters
- Total WBC Count: Elevation (>14,000 cells/mm³) suggests bacterial infection or inflammation; decrease may indicate bone marrow suppression 1
- Differential Count:
- Neutrophils: Elevation suggests bacterial infection; left shift (>16% bands or >1,500 band neutrophils/mm³) strongly indicates bacterial infection 1
- Lymphocytes: Elevation may indicate viral infection; decrease may suggest immunosuppression 1
- Monocytes: Elevation may indicate chronic inflammation or certain infections 1
- Eosinophils: Elevation suggests allergic reaction, parasitic infection, or certain malignancies 1
- Basophils: Elevation may indicate myeloproliferative disorders 1
Platelet Parameters
- Platelet Count: Abnormalities may indicate bleeding disorders, bone marrow dysfunction, or consumption disorders 1
- Mean Platelet Volume (MPV): Provides information about platelet production and function 2
Interpretation Approach
Step 1: Evaluate Red Blood Cell Parameters
- Assess for anemia (decreased hemoglobin/hematocrit) or polycythemia (increased hemoglobin/hematocrit) 1
- If anemia is present, use MCV to classify:
- Microcytic (<80 fL): Consider iron deficiency, thalassemia, anemia of chronic disease, or sideroblastic anemia 1
- Normocytic (80-100 fL): Consider hemorrhage, hemolysis, bone marrow failure, anemia of chronic inflammation, or renal insufficiency 1
- Macrocytic (>100 fL): Consider vitamin B12/folate deficiency, alcoholism, medications, or myelodysplastic syndrome 1
- Calculate the reticulocyte index (RI) to distinguish between production and destruction causes:
Step 2: Evaluate White Blood Cell Parameters
- Assess total WBC count for leukocytosis or leukopenia 1
- Examine differential for specific cell line abnormalities:
- Note that lymphocytes and eosinophils peak overnight, while neutrophils peak in late afternoon, which may affect interpretation 3
Step 3: Evaluate Platelet Parameters
- Assess for thrombocytopenia or thrombocytosis 1
- Consider potential causes based on clinical context:
Special Considerations
Diurnal Variation
- CBC components show significant time-of-day variation that may affect interpretation 3:
- Lymphocytes and eosinophils peak overnight
- Erythrocytes, hemoglobin, and hematocrit peak in the morning
- Platelets, neutrophils, monocytes, and basophils peak in late afternoon
Patient-Specific Setpoints
- Healthy individuals maintain stable CBC values (setpoints) that are unique to them and persist for decades 4
- Comparing current results to patient's historical values may be more meaningful than using population-based reference ranges 4
Clinical Context
- Always interpret CBC results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation 5
- Provide relevant clinical information when ordering CBCs to help laboratory staff with interpretation 5
Reporting Considerations
- For immunophenotyping, report both percentages and absolute counts when available 1
- When reporting CD4+ T-cell counts, include both percentage and absolute number 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Failing to correct for lymphocyte purity when reporting immunophenotyping results 1
- Overlooking the significance of left shift (increased band neutrophils) even in the absence of leukocytosis 1
- Misinterpreting isolated laboratory values without clinical context 5
- Not considering diurnal variations when interpreting borderline abnormal results 3
- Relying solely on population-based reference ranges rather than considering patient-specific setpoints 4
- Ordering additional tests when results will not change management decisions 1