Difference Between Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP) and Bacterial Peritonitis
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is defined as a bacterial infection of ascitic fluid without any intra-abdominal surgically treatable source of infection, while secondary bacterial peritonitis results from perforation or inflammation of an intra-abdominal organ requiring surgical intervention. 1
Diagnostic Differences
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP)
- Diagnosis is based on an ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocyte count >250/mm³, regardless of culture results 1, 2
- Typically monomicrobial infection (single organism) 1
- Ascitic fluid culture is positive in only about 50-80% of cases (higher with bedside inoculation into blood culture bottles) 1, 3
- No evidence of surgically treatable intra-abdominal source of infection 1
- Common in patients with cirrhosis and ascites (prevalence: 1.5-3.5% in outpatients, 10% in hospitalized patients) 1
Secondary Bacterial Peritonitis
- Often presents with localized abdominal symptoms or signs 1
- Multiple organisms typically seen on Gram stain or in culture 1
- Higher ascitic PMN count (often >1,000/mm³) 1
- Higher ascitic total protein concentration (≥1 g/dL) 1
- Elevated LDH in ascitic fluid (above normal upper limit of serum LDH) 1
- Lower ascitic glucose concentration (≤50 mg/dL) 1
- Elevated ascitic fluid CEA (>5 ng/mL) or alkaline phosphatase (>240 U/L) may indicate intestinal perforation 1
- Requires imaging (CT scan) for diagnosis and surgical evaluation 1
Treatment Differences
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP)
- Immediate empirical antibiotic therapy upon diagnosis 2
- First-line treatment: third-generation cephalosporins (e.g., cefotaxime 2g IV every 6-8 hours for 5 days) 2, 4
- Intravenous albumin (1.5 g/kg at diagnosis and 1 g/kg on day 3) significantly reduces risk of hepatorenal syndrome and mortality 2
- No surgical intervention required 1
- Treatment success defined as decrease in ascitic neutrophil count by at least 25% of pre-treatment value with clinical improvement 2
- Prophylactic antibiotics recommended after first episode to prevent recurrence 4
Secondary Bacterial Peritonitis
- Requires prompt surgical consultation and intervention 1
- Broader spectrum antibiotics often needed to cover multiple organisms 1
- Mortality rate is higher (50-80%) compared to SBP (approximately 20%) 1, 2
- Surgical treatment of the underlying cause (e.g., perforation, abscess) is essential 1
- Imaging-guided drainage may be required in addition to antibiotics 1
Clinical Presentation Differences
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP)
- Often subtle or asymptomatic presentation 3
- May present with fever, abdominal pain, altered mental status, or worsening of liver function 1, 3
- Signs of systemic inflammation: hyper/hypothermia, chills, altered white blood cell count, tachycardia, tachypnea 1
- Worsening of hepatic encephalopathy, renal function, or GI bleeding may be the only manifestation 1
Secondary Bacterial Peritonitis
- More likely to present with localized abdominal pain and tenderness 1
- Often has more pronounced signs of peritoneal irritation 1
- May have signs specific to the underlying cause (e.g., signs of bowel perforation) 1
- Inadequate response to standard antibiotic therapy for SBP 1
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
- Delaying antibiotic therapy in suspected SBP increases mortality by approximately 10% for every hour's delay in patients with septic shock 2
- Unnecessary laparotomy in cirrhotic patients with SBP misdiagnosed as secondary peritonitis increases mortality 1
- Culture-negative neutrocytic ascites (PMN count ≥250/mm³ but negative culture) should be treated as SBP 1
- Bacterascites (positive culture but PMN count <250/mm³) requires treatment only if the patient is symptomatic or has signs of infection 1
- Patients with cirrhosis and ascites should undergo diagnostic paracentesis at hospital admission to rule out SBP, even without symptoms suggestive of infection 1, 2
- Multidrug-resistant organisms are increasingly common in SBP, particularly in healthcare-associated and nosocomial infections, which may require alternative antibiotic strategies 3, 5