Recommended Procedure for FISH and HER2/neu Testing in Breast Cancer
The recommended procedure for conducting FISH and HER2/neu testing requires standardized protocols in CAP-accredited laboratories with strict quality control measures to ensure accurate determination of HER2 status for appropriate treatment selection. 1
Testing Algorithm
- HER2 status should be determined for all invasive breast cancer cases using a validated testing algorithm 1
- The recommended approach is a two-phase testing algorithm:
- Alternatively, FISH can be used as the primary testing method 1
Specimen Handling Requirements
- Tissue must be fixed in neutral buffered formalin 1
- Core needle biopsies must be fixed for at least 1 hour 1
- Excisional biopsies must be fixed for 6-48 hours 1
- Specimens fixed in other fixatives should be excluded from testing 1
- Proper tissue handling is critical as poor fixation can lead to false-negative IHC results 1
FISH Testing Procedure
- FISH testing detects gene amplification rather than protein expression 1
- A positive HER2 FISH result is defined as:
- More than six HER2 gene copies per nucleus, OR
- A FISH ratio (HER2 gene signals to chromosome 17 signals) of more than 2.2 1
- A negative HER2 FISH result is defined as:
- Less than 4.0 HER2 gene copies per nucleus, OR
- FISH ratio of less than 1.8 1
- Equivocal results fall between positive and negative parameters and require additional testing 1
IHC Testing Procedure
- IHC detects HER2 protein overexpression 1
- A positive HER2 IHC result is defined as:
- 3+ staining (uniform, intense membrane staining of ≥30% of invasive tumor cells) 1
- A negative HER2 IHC result is defined as:
- 0 or 1+ staining 1
- Equivocal (2+) results require reflex testing with FISH 1
Quality Assurance Requirements
- Laboratories must demonstrate 95% concordance with another validated test for positive and negative assay values 1
- Participation in external proficiency testing with at least two testing events per year is mandatory 1
- Satisfactory performance requires at least 90% correct responses on graded challenges 1
- Ongoing quality control must include review of external and internal controls with each test batch 1
- Laboratories should maintain standardized operating procedures and documentation of controls 1
- Onsite inspection should occur every other year with annual self-inspection 1
Laboratory Accreditation and Volume Requirements
- HER2 testing should be performed in CAP-accredited laboratories or laboratories meeting equivalent accreditation standards 1
- Some guidelines recommend restricting IHC testing to laboratories with a minimum annual caseload of 250 cases 1
- FISH centers should test a minimum of 100 cases per year, preferably at least 150 1
- Higher volume laboratories tend to have better performance, particularly for FISH testing 1
Common Pitfalls and Considerations
- Concordance between local and central laboratory testing is highest for IHC 3+ samples (77%) and lowest for IHC 2+ samples (26%) 2
- Only 33% of samples testing IHC 2+ at local laboratories are confirmed FISH-positive at central laboratories 2
- Discordance rates between FISH and IHC for 3+ cases can be up to 22.22%, indicating that even strong IHC positivity should be confirmed by FISH in some cases 3
- Pre-analytical factors (fixation, processing) significantly impact test accuracy 1
- Tumor heterogeneity may lead to false-negative results if sampling is inadequate 4
- FISH has comparable specificity but higher sensitivity compared to IHC for detecting HER2 status 5
By following these standardized procedures and quality control measures, laboratories can ensure accurate HER2 testing to appropriately identify patients who will benefit from HER2-targeted therapies such as trastuzumab, which significantly improves survival outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer patients 1.