What is the recommended procedure for conducting the Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) test and Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2)/neu test?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recommended Procedure for FISH and HER2/neu Testing in Breast Cancer

The recommended procedure for conducting FISH and HER2/neu testing requires standardized protocols in CAP-accredited laboratories with strict quality control measures to ensure accurate determination of HER2 status for appropriate treatment selection. 1

Testing Algorithm

  • HER2 status should be determined for all invasive breast cancer cases using a validated testing algorithm 1
  • The recommended approach is a two-phase testing algorithm:
    • Initial screening with immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1
    • Reflex to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for equivocal IHC cases 1
  • Alternatively, FISH can be used as the primary testing method 1

Specimen Handling Requirements

  • Tissue must be fixed in neutral buffered formalin 1
  • Core needle biopsies must be fixed for at least 1 hour 1
  • Excisional biopsies must be fixed for 6-48 hours 1
  • Specimens fixed in other fixatives should be excluded from testing 1
  • Proper tissue handling is critical as poor fixation can lead to false-negative IHC results 1

FISH Testing Procedure

  • FISH testing detects gene amplification rather than protein expression 1
  • A positive HER2 FISH result is defined as:
    • More than six HER2 gene copies per nucleus, OR
    • A FISH ratio (HER2 gene signals to chromosome 17 signals) of more than 2.2 1
  • A negative HER2 FISH result is defined as:
    • Less than 4.0 HER2 gene copies per nucleus, OR
    • FISH ratio of less than 1.8 1
  • Equivocal results fall between positive and negative parameters and require additional testing 1

IHC Testing Procedure

  • IHC detects HER2 protein overexpression 1
  • A positive HER2 IHC result is defined as:
    • 3+ staining (uniform, intense membrane staining of ≥30% of invasive tumor cells) 1
  • A negative HER2 IHC result is defined as:
    • 0 or 1+ staining 1
  • Equivocal (2+) results require reflex testing with FISH 1

Quality Assurance Requirements

  • Laboratories must demonstrate 95% concordance with another validated test for positive and negative assay values 1
  • Participation in external proficiency testing with at least two testing events per year is mandatory 1
  • Satisfactory performance requires at least 90% correct responses on graded challenges 1
  • Ongoing quality control must include review of external and internal controls with each test batch 1
  • Laboratories should maintain standardized operating procedures and documentation of controls 1
  • Onsite inspection should occur every other year with annual self-inspection 1

Laboratory Accreditation and Volume Requirements

  • HER2 testing should be performed in CAP-accredited laboratories or laboratories meeting equivalent accreditation standards 1
  • Some guidelines recommend restricting IHC testing to laboratories with a minimum annual caseload of 250 cases 1
  • FISH centers should test a minimum of 100 cases per year, preferably at least 150 1
  • Higher volume laboratories tend to have better performance, particularly for FISH testing 1

Common Pitfalls and Considerations

  • Concordance between local and central laboratory testing is highest for IHC 3+ samples (77%) and lowest for IHC 2+ samples (26%) 2
  • Only 33% of samples testing IHC 2+ at local laboratories are confirmed FISH-positive at central laboratories 2
  • Discordance rates between FISH and IHC for 3+ cases can be up to 22.22%, indicating that even strong IHC positivity should be confirmed by FISH in some cases 3
  • Pre-analytical factors (fixation, processing) significantly impact test accuracy 1
  • Tumor heterogeneity may lead to false-negative results if sampling is inadequate 4
  • FISH has comparable specificity but higher sensitivity compared to IHC for detecting HER2 status 5

By following these standardized procedures and quality control measures, laboratories can ensure accurate HER2 testing to appropriately identify patients who will benefit from HER2-targeted therapies such as trastuzumab, which significantly improves survival outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer patients 1.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.