When is the Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) test for Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) positivity recommended in breast cancer patients?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

When is FISH Test for HER2 Positive in Breast Cancer

A FISH test is considered positive for HER2 when the HER2/CEP17 ratio is greater than 2.2 OR when the average HER2 gene copy number is 6.0 or more signals per cell. 1

Primary Testing Criteria for HER2 Positivity by FISH

FISH positivity is defined by either of two parameters:

  • HER2/CEP17 ratio > 2.2 (for dual-probe FISH assays using a chromosome 17 centromeric control probe) 1
  • Average HER2 gene copy number ≥ 6.0 signals per cell (for single-probe FISH assays without internal control) 1

These thresholds were established based on clinical trial data from major trastuzumab studies, where patients meeting these criteria demonstrated significant benefit from HER2-targeted therapy. 2

When FISH Testing Should Be Performed

FISH testing is indicated in the following clinical scenarios:

  • As reflex testing for equivocal IHC results (2+ staining) - This is the most common indication, where IHC shows complete membrane staining that is either nonuniform or weak in intensity in at least 10% of tumor cells 1

  • As primary testing method - FISH can be used as the initial HER2 assessment instead of IHC, though this is less common due to higher cost and longer turnaround time 1, 3, 4

  • For confirmation when IHC 3+ results appear discordant with clinical/histopathologic features - If the pathologist or oncologist observes apparent histopathologic discordance after initial testing 1

  • When IHC testing fails or is indeterminate due to technical issues, inadequate fixation, or artifacts 1

Equivocal FISH Results Requiring Additional Testing

FISH results are considered equivocal when:

  • HER2/CEP17 ratio is 1.8 to 2.2 (dual-probe assay) 1
  • Average HER2 gene copy number is 4.0 to 6.0 signals per cell (single-probe assay) 1

When FISH results are equivocal, reflex testing with IHC on the same specimen is mandatory to arrive at a definitive HER2 status designation. 1 This represents a critical update from earlier guidelines and eliminates the equivocal category when both tests are performed. 5

Important Clinical Considerations

A notable caveat exists for patients with HER2/CEP17 ratios between 2.0 and 2.2: These patients were considered HER2-positive and were eligible for treatment in the adjuvant trastuzumab trials (NSABP B31, NCCTG N9831, HERA). 1, 2 Therefore, available efficacy data support including them in HER2-targeted therapy, even though they fall into what would otherwise be an equivocal range. 1

Polysomy 17 creates interpretive challenges: Approximately 8% of specimens show polysomy 17, mostly among cases with 4-6 HER2 gene copies (equivocal range). 1 In these cases, the HER2/CEP17 ratio may be low despite increased absolute HER2 copy numbers, requiring careful interpretation and often reflex IHC testing. 1, 6

Testing Algorithm and Quality Requirements

The recommended testing sequence is:

  1. Initial IHC testing on all invasive breast cancer specimens 1, 3
  2. Automatic reflex to FISH for IHC 2+ (equivocal) results 1
  3. Consider FISH for IHC 3+ if histopathologic features suggest discordance 1

Laboratories performing FISH testing must demonstrate 95% concordance with validated methods and maintain ongoing quality assurance programs. 1, 3 Testing should only be performed in CAP-accredited laboratories or equivalent. 1, 3

Impact of Updated Guidelines

The 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline update significantly changed HER2 classification: In a retrospective study of 2,233 cases, 8.2% of cases were reclassified when reassessed by 2018 guidelines compared to 2013 guidelines. 5 Most notably, 175 previously equivocal cases were definitively classified as either negative (n=173) or positive (n=2) after mandatory reflex IHC testing. 5

Alternative FISH probes (TP53, RAI1, RARA) may be used for persistently equivocal cases: Studies show that approximately 50% of cases equivocal by conventional FISH become classified as HER2-amplified when tested with alternative chromosome 17 probes. 6 However, this approach requires further clinical validation to determine treatment benefit. 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.