What should be included in a sample agenda for a laboratory (lab) management review?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 31, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Sample Agenda for Laboratory Management Review

A comprehensive laboratory management review agenda should include quality assurance monitoring, performance evaluation, error analysis, and process improvement components to ensure optimal laboratory operations and patient outcomes.

Pre-Review Preparation

  • Compile relevant quality indicators and performance metrics from the previous review period 1
  • Gather documentation of any non-conforming events, errors, or incidents 1
  • Collect feedback from laboratory users (clinicians, nurses, other departments) 1
  • Prepare summary reports of proficiency testing and external quality assessment results 1

Opening Items

  • Introduction and attendance 1
  • Review of previous meeting minutes and action items 2
  • Overview of laboratory performance since last review 1

Quality Management System Review

  • Assessment of pre-analytical processes:

    • Specimen collection, handling, transportation, and storage protocols 1
    • Sample rejection rates and reasons 1
    • Documentation of test requests and requisition forms 1
  • Evaluation of analytical processes:

    • Instrument performance and maintenance records 1
    • Quality control data and trends 1
    • Calibration verification results 1
    • Method validation and verification activities 1
  • Review of post-analytical processes:

    • Timeliness of reporting results 1
    • Critical value notification compliance 1
    • Report format and clarity assessment 1
    • Test result storage and retrieval systems 1

Personnel and Training

  • Staff competency assessment results 1
  • Training needs identification 1
  • Continuing education activities 1
  • Personnel safety incidents and compliance with safety protocols 1

Quality Assurance Activities

  • Proficiency testing/external quality assessment performance 1
  • Internal quality control performance 1
  • Corrective and preventive actions (CAPA) review 1
  • Document control system effectiveness 1

Resource Management

  • Equipment performance and maintenance 1
  • Inventory management and supply chain issues 1
  • Budget review and resource allocation 3
  • Information system performance and needs 1

Risk Management

  • Identification of potential errors and risks 4
  • Root cause analysis of significant errors 1
  • Implementation of risk mitigation strategies 4
  • Evaluation of effectiveness of previous risk reduction measures 1

Performance Improvement

  • Review of quality indicators and metrics 4
  • Turnaround time analysis 1
  • Customer satisfaction survey results 1
  • Benchmarking against peer laboratories 4

Regulatory Compliance

  • Status of accreditation requirements 3
  • Changes in relevant regulations or standards 5
  • Compliance with documentation requirements 1
  • Results of recent inspections or audits 3

Strategic Planning

  • Review of laboratory mission and objectives 5
  • Evaluation of new testing methodologies 1
  • Technology assessment and acquisition plans 5
  • Workflow optimization opportunities 1

Action Items and Closing

  • Assignment of responsibilities for identified issues 1
  • Timeline for implementation of corrective actions 1
  • Date for follow-up review 2
  • Documentation of management review conclusions 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Focusing only on analytical processes while neglecting pre- and post-analytical phases where most errors occur (60% and 25% respectively) 1
  • Failing to document corrective actions and their effectiveness 1
  • Not involving staff in quality improvement initiatives, which reduces ownership and compliance 1
  • Creating overly complex documentation that isn't user-friendly or accessible at the bench 1
  • Neglecting to close the feedback loop with users of laboratory services 1
  • Implementing too many improvement initiatives simultaneously rather than focusing on high-impact areas 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Medical laboratory quality systems - a management review.

International journal of health care quality assurance, 2015

Research

[CAP quality management system in clinical laboratory and its issue].

Rinsho byori. The Japanese journal of clinical pathology, 2004

Research

Laboratory quality management system fundamentals.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.