How do you differentiate between systemic mastocytosis and mast cell activation syndrome?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 31, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Differentiating Systemic Mastocytosis from Mast Cell Activation Syndrome

The key distinction is that systemic mastocytosis (SM) meets WHO diagnostic criteria with pathologic evidence of clonal mast cell infiltration in bone marrow or other organs, while mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) presents with mast cell activation symptoms but does NOT fulfill WHO criteria for SM. 1

Diagnostic Algorithm

Step 1: Evaluate for Systemic Mastocytosis First

When a patient presents with suspected mast cell activation symptoms, you must perform:

  • Bone marrow biopsy with immunophenotyping (CD117, CD25, CD2, tryptase) 1
  • KIT D816V mutation testing using allele-specific PCR or high-sensitivity methods 1
  • Serum tryptase level (baseline, not during acute episode) 1
  • Flow cytometry to detect aberrant CD25/CD2 expression on mast cells 1

Step 2: Apply WHO Diagnostic Criteria for SM

SM is diagnosed when:

  • 1 major criterion + 1 minor criterion, OR
  • ≥3 minor criteria are present 1

Major criterion: Multifocal, dense infiltrates of ≥15 mast cells in aggregates in bone marrow or extracutaneous organs 1

Minor criteria: 1

  • 25% atypical/spindle-shaped mast cells in bone marrow

  • KIT D816V or other activating KIT mutation detected
  • Aberrant expression of CD25 ± CD2 on mast cells
  • Persistently elevated baseline serum tryptase >20 ng/mL (in absence of associated myeloid neoplasm)

Step 3: If WHO Criteria NOT Met, Consider MCAS

MCAS is diagnosed when all 3 criteria are present: 2, 3

  1. Clinical symptoms of recurrent, episodic, systemic mast cell activation (flushing, pruritus, hypotension, GI symptoms, anaphylaxis)
  2. Biochemical evidence: Acute tryptase increase to >20% + 2 ng/mL above baseline within 1-4 hours of symptom onset 2
  3. Response to antimediator therapy (H1/H2 antihistamines, mast cell stabilizers, leukotriene inhibitors) 2, 3

Critical Distinguishing Features

Baseline Serum Tryptase

  • SM: Persistently elevated baseline tryptase >20 ng/mL in most cases 1
  • MCAS: Baseline tryptase may be <20 ng/mL or normal; only transiently elevated during acute episodes 1, 2

Bone Marrow Findings

  • SM: Dense mast cell infiltrates (≥15 cells in aggregates), spindle-shaped morphology, aberrant CD25/CD2 expression 1
  • MCAS: Normal mast cell morphology and immunophenotype, no clonal markers 1, 2

KIT D816V Mutation

  • SM: Present in most cases (>80-90%) 1, 4
  • MCAS: Absent 1, 2, 4

Skin Involvement

  • SM: Mastocytosis in skin (urticaria pigmentosa) present in ~85% of indolent SM cases 1
  • MCAS: No characteristic skin lesions of mastocytosis 1, 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not diagnose MCAS without excluding SM first. The diagnostic algorithm explicitly requires bone marrow evaluation to rule out SM before considering MCAS 1. This is critical because SM requires different management and has prognostic implications.

Beware of hereditary alpha-tryptasemia (HαT). This genetic condition causes elevated baseline tryptase and mast cell activation symptoms but is distinct from both SM and MCAS 1. Consider TPSAB1 gene testing if baseline tryptase is elevated without meeting SM criteria 1.

Tryptase timing matters. For MCAS diagnosis, you need both baseline tryptase AND acute tryptase drawn within 1-4 hours of symptom onset 2. A single elevated tryptase during symptoms without knowing the baseline is insufficient.

Secondary causes must be excluded. Before diagnosing primary MCAS, rule out allergies, drugs, infections, and other inflammatory conditions that can cause secondary mast cell activation 1, 3.

When Diagnostic Uncertainty Exists

If bone marrow shows subtle findings or low mast cell burden that doesn't clearly meet WHO criteria, use the Spanish Network on Mastocytosis score as a predictive model to determine if repeat bone marrow studies are warranted 2. This helps identify patients with clonal mast cell disorders at low frequencies who might otherwise be misclassified as MCAS.

Referral to specialized centers with expertise in mastocytosis is strongly recommended for complex or borderline cases 1, 5.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Clinical Approach to Mast Cell Activation Syndrome: A Practical Overview.

Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology, 2021

Research

Mast Cell Activation Syndromes: Collegium Internationale Allergologicum Update 2022.

International archives of allergy and immunology, 2022

Guideline

Treatment Options for Mastocytosis Diagnosed via Bone Biopsy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.