What is the role of the Centor score in diagnosing streptococcal (Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal) pharyngitis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 31, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

The Role of Centor Score in Diagnosing Streptococcal Pharyngitis

The Centor score is a validated clinical decision rule that effectively stratifies the risk of Group A Streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis and should guide testing and treatment decisions in patients presenting with sore throat. 1

Components of the Centor Score

The Centor score consists of four clinical features, with one point assigned for each:

  • Fever by history (temperature >38°C/100.4°F) 2, 1
  • Tonsillar exudates 2, 1
  • Tender anterior cervical adenopathy 2, 1
  • Absence of cough 2, 1

Risk Stratification Based on Centor Score

The Centor score effectively stratifies patients according to their likelihood of GAS pharyngitis:

  • Score of 0: 2.5% risk of GAS infection 2
  • Score of 1: 5-10% risk of GAS infection 2
  • Score of 2: 11-17% risk of GAS infection 2
  • Score of 3: 28-35% risk of GAS infection 2
  • Score of 4: 51-53% risk of GAS infection 2

Modified Centor Score

The original Centor score was later modified to include age as an additional criterion:

  • Age 3-14 years: add 1 point 2
  • Age 15-44 years: add 0 points 2
  • Age ≥45 years: subtract 1 point 2

This modification improves diagnostic accuracy by accounting for the higher prevalence of GAS in children and lower prevalence in older adults 1, 3.

Testing Recommendations Based on Centor Score

  • Score 0-1: No testing or antibiotics recommended (low probability of GAS) 1, 4
  • Score 2: Consider rapid antigen detection test (RADT) 1, 5
  • Score 3-4: Perform RADT; high probability of GAS infection 1, 5

Diagnostic Accuracy and Validation

  • The Centor score has been validated in large-scale studies with consistent performance across diverse populations 3
  • A large validation study of 206,870 patients confirmed the predictive value of both Centor and McIsaac scores 3
  • For patients with a Centor score of 4, approximately 57% tested positive for GAS 3
  • For patients with a Centor score of 0, only 7% tested positive for GAS 3

Role of Rapid Antigen Detection Tests (RADT)

  • RADTs have high specificity (≥95%) but variable sensitivity (80-90%) compared to throat culture 6
  • The accuracy of RADTs increases when performed in patients with higher Centor scores 2
  • For adults with a negative RADT, backup throat culture is generally not necessary 6
  • For children with a negative RADT, backup throat culture is recommended due to higher prevalence of GAS and risk of complications 6

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Treating based on clinical symptoms alone without laboratory confirmation leads to antibiotic overuse 6, 4
  • Testing patients with clear viral symptoms unnecessarily increases healthcare costs 4
  • Overreliance on the Centor score without considering age-specific modifications may reduce accuracy 1
  • The Centor criteria have lower utility in children under 3 years due to different clinical presentations 1
  • Improper swabbing technique can reduce test accuracy; both posterior pharyngeal wall and tonsils should be swabbed 2

Antibiotic Stewardship Considerations

  • Antibiotics should not be prescribed for patients with low Centor scores (0-2) 1, 7
  • For patients with scores 3-4, benefits of antibiotics should be weighed against risks of side effects and antimicrobial resistance 1
  • Studies in developing countries show high rates of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for pharyngitis that could be reduced with proper use of Centor/McIsaac scores 7, 8

The Centor score remains a valuable clinical tool for the initial assessment of patients with suspected streptococcal pharyngitis, helping clinicians make evidence-based decisions about testing and treatment while promoting antibiotic stewardship.

References

Guideline

Diagnosing Streptococcal Pharyngitis with Centor Criteria

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Criteria for Testing for Strep Throat

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Optimal management of adults with pharyngitis--a multi-criteria decision analysis.

BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2006

Guideline

Management of Pharyngitis After Negative Strep Test

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.