What is the diagnosis for a patient with a suspected Salter-Harris (Type 1 fracture of the growth plate) fracture of the distal fibular physis, presenting with tenderness over the lateral malleolus and potential ligamentous injury, based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Differential Diagnosis for Right Ankle Injury

  • Single most likely diagnosis
    • Undisplaced Salter-Harris 1 fracture of the distal fibular physis with a vertical component: This diagnosis is most likely due to the presence of bone marrow edema in the distal fibula, a linear region of low signal extending from the physis distally, and minimal bone marrow edema superior to the physis, all of which are consistent with a Salter-Harris 1 fracture.
  • Other Likely diagnoses
    • Distal fibular stress fracture: The presence of bone marrow edema in the distal fibula could also be consistent with a stress fracture, although the linear region of low signal and the involvement of the physis make a Salter-Harris 1 fracture more likely.
    • Lateral malleolar contusion: The patient's tenderness over the lateral malleolus and the presence of bone marrow edema could also be consistent with a contusion, although the presence of a linear region of low signal suggests a more significant injury.
  • Do Not Miss diagnoses
    • Osteonecrosis of the distal fibula: Although not directly suggested by the MRI findings, osteonecrosis could be a potential complication of a fracture or other injury, and missing this diagnosis could have significant consequences.
    • Infection (e.g. osteomyelitis): Infection is always a potential concern in the setting of trauma or injury, and although there is no evidence of infection on the MRI, it is essential to consider this possibility to avoid missing a potentially serious condition.
  • Rare diagnoses
    • Fibular aplasia or hypoplasia: Although not suggested by the MRI findings, these rare conditions could potentially be considered in the differential diagnosis, particularly if there are other abnormalities or inconsistencies in the patient's presentation.
    • Bone tumor (e.g. osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma): Although the MRI findings do not suggest a bone tumor, these rare conditions could potentially be considered in the differential diagnosis, particularly if the patient's symptoms are atypical or persistent.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.