Indications for Renal Artery Intervention in Renal Artery Stenosis
Medical therapy with at least 3 antihypertensive medications (including a diuretic) at maximally tolerated doses is the mandatory first-line treatment for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, with intervention reserved only for specific high-risk clinical scenarios after medical therapy has failed. 1
Etiology-Specific Approach
Fibromuscular Dysplasia
- Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) WITHOUT stenting is the treatment of choice for fibromuscular dysplasia and should be considered as first-line revascularization (Class IIa recommendation). 1, 2
- Bailout stenting may be used only if angioplasty fails. 1
- This approach can restore renal perfusion pressure and effectively lower blood pressure. 1, 2
Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis
Anatomic Criteria Required (Must Meet ONE):
- ≥70% diameter stenosis by visual estimation or intravascular ultrasound 1, 2
- 50-69% diameter stenosis WITH hemodynamic confirmation:
- 50-69% stenosis with post-stenotic dilatation 1, 2
Clinical Criteria Required (Must Meet ONE):
APPROPRIATE Indications (Class IIa):
- Flash pulmonary edema (sudden onset pulmonary edema) with severe RAS 1
- Accelerating decline in renal function with bilateral RAS or RAS in solitary functioning kidney 1
- Resistant hypertension (failure of ≥3 maximally tolerated antihypertensive medications, one being a diuretic) with unilateral >70% RAS and signs of kidney viability 1, 2
- Bilateral RAS (>70%) or RAS in solitary kidney with high-risk features and kidney viability 1, 2
MAY BE APPROPRIATE Indications (Class IIb):
- Recurrent heart failure despite maximal medical therapy with severe RAS 1
- Recurrent unstable angina despite maximal medical therapy with severe RAS 1
- Hypertension with unexplained unilaterally small kidney or chronic kidney disease with significant RAS 1
- Intolerance to 3-antihypertensive medication regimen with hemodynamically significant RAS 1
- Stable renal function with unilateral significant RAS (selected patients only) 1
RARELY APPROPRIATE (Class III):
- Newly diagnosed atherosclerotic RAS (should receive optimal medical therapy first) 1
- Well-controlled hypertension on current medications 1
- Poorly controlled hypertension on <3 antihypertensive medications 1
- Incidentally discovered RAS without symptoms 1
- Small (<7 cm pole to pole) nonviable kidneys 1
- Moderate RAS (50-69%) without hemodynamic confirmation 1
Assessment of Kidney Viability (Required Before Intervention)
Signs of Viability (Favors Intervention): 1
- Renal size >8 cm 1
- Distinct cortex >0.5 cm 1
- Albumin-creatinine ratio <20 mg/mmol 1
- Renal resistance index <0.8 1
Signs of Non-Viability (Intervention Rarely Appropriate): 1
- Renal size <7 cm 1
- Loss of corticomedullary differentiation 1
- Albumin-creatinine ratio >30 mg/mmol 1
- Renal resistance index >0.8 1
Technical Considerations
- Primary stenting is standard practice for atherosclerotic RAS (not for fibromuscular dysplasia). 1
- Intravascular ultrasound should be used to optimize stent sizing, as undersizing increases restenosis risk and oversizing risks vessel rupture. 1
- Translesional pressure gradient measurement is necessary for moderate stenoses (50-69%) since invasive angiography alone cannot distinguish hemodynamic significance. 1
- Open surgical revascularization should be considered when endovascular intervention is technically unfeasible or has failed. 1
Post-Intervention Surveillance
Mandatory follow-up schedule: 2
Re-intervention may be considered for: 1
- In-stent restenosis ≥60% detected by duplex ultrasound 1
- Recurrent symptoms (diastolic BP >90 mmHg on >3 antihypertensive drugs) 1
20% increase in serum creatinine 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not intervene without first establishing optimal medical therapy (3 antihypertensive medications at maximal tolerated doses, including a diuretic). 1, 2
- Do not use stenting for fibromuscular dysplasia as primary treatment; angioplasty alone is preferred. 1, 2
- Do not intervene on kidneys <7 cm or with other signs of non-viability, as outcomes are poor. 1
- Do not rely on visual angiographic estimation alone for moderate stenoses (50-69%); hemodynamic confirmation is required. 1
- Do not intervene on incidentally discovered RAS without clinical manifestations. 1