Did the BICAR-ICU 2 trial show a difference in mortality for patients with Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) stage 2-3 compared to the BICAR-ICU 1 trial?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

BICAR-ICU 2 vs BICAR-ICU 1 Mortality Comparison in AKI Stage 2-3

The BICAR-ICU 2 trial is specifically designed to evaluate mortality in patients with moderate-to-severe AKI (stage 2-3) and severe metabolic acidosis, representing a focused investigation of the subgroup that showed mortality benefit in BICAR-ICU 1. 1

Key Differences Between the Trials

BICAR-ICU 1 Findings

  • The original BICAR-ICU 1 trial demonstrated that sodium bicarbonate infusion was associated with higher survival rates in a prespecified stratum of patients with both severe metabolic acidemia and acute kidney injury 1
  • This mortality benefit was observed as a secondary endpoint in the subgroup analysis, not the primary outcome of the overall trial 1
  • Long-term follow-up showed 5-year overall survival of approximately 30% with no significant difference between bicarbonate and control groups in the general population 2

BICAR-ICU 2 Design Rationale

  • BICAR-ICU 2 specifically targets patients with both severe metabolic acidemia (pH ≤7.20, PaCO2 ≤45 mmHg, bicarbonate ≤20 mmol/L) AND moderate-to-severe AKI 1
  • This population has an expected day-28 mortality of approximately 55-60%, substantially higher than the general ICU population 1
  • The primary outcome is day-90 mortality (not day-28), allowing assessment of longer-term survival impact 1

Clinical Context of AKI Stage 2-3 Mortality

Mortality Risk by AKI Stage

  • AKI stage 2 and 3 patients have the highest mortality among all AKI stages 3
  • Stage 2 AKI (creatinine increase 2.0-2.9 times baseline) is strongly correlated with increased mortality 3
  • Stage 3 AKI (creatinine increase ≥3.0 times baseline or ≥4.0 mg/dL) carries the greatest mortality risk 3, 4

Attributable Mortality Data

  • The attributable mortality of stage 2 AKI is 12.4% (95% CI 2.6-21.8%) 5
  • The attributable mortality of stage 3 AKI is 16.1% (95% CI 8.2-23.8%) 5
  • Hospital mortality odds ratios increase progressively: stage 1 OR=1.73, stage 2 OR=1.88, stage 3 OR=2.89 6

Why BICAR-ICU 2 Focuses on This Population

Mechanistic Rationale

  • The majority of excess mortality risk associated with severe AKI is attenuated by metabolic acidosis and cumulative fluid balance 6
  • Approximately 70% of excess mortality in stage 3 AKI is explained by AKI-related complications, particularly metabolic acidosis 6
  • Sodium bicarbonate may improve outcomes specifically when metabolic acidosis is present (OR 0.70,95% CI 0.53-0.92) 6

Study Status

  • BICAR-ICU 2 is an ongoing trial designed to definitively answer whether sodium bicarbonate improves 90-day survival in this high-risk subgroup 1
  • The trial uses 4.2% sodium bicarbonate infusion titrated to maintain pH ≥7.30 1
  • Results are not yet published, so direct mortality comparison between trials cannot be made at this time 1

Important Clinical Caveats

  • The BICAR-ICU 1 subgroup finding was hypothesis-generating, not definitive evidence, which is why BICAR-ICU 2 was designed 1
  • Long-term quality of life remains significantly impaired in survivors regardless of bicarbonate therapy, particularly in physical domains 2
  • Neither stage 1 AKI nor transient AKI showed increased mortality in matched analyses, emphasizing the importance of AKI severity and persistence 5
  • The incidence of AKI in ICU patients exceeds 50%, with increasing severity directly correlating with mortality risk 7

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.