What are the guidelines for choosing IV fluid boluses in a resuscitation (resus) setting?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

IV Fluid Boluses in Resuscitation: Evidence-Based Guidelines

Primary Recommendation

Use balanced crystalloids (such as Ringer's Lactate or Plasmalyte) as first-line fluid therapy for resuscitation in critically ill patients, regardless of the underlying cause of shock. 1, 2


Crystalloids vs. Colloids: The Foundation

Crystalloids should be used as first-line therapy over colloids in all resuscitation scenarios. 2, 3

Why Crystalloids Win:

  • Avoid synthetic colloids entirely (particularly hydroxyethyl starches) due to increased risk of acute kidney injury, mortality, and bleeding complications in critically ill patients 1, 2, 3

  • Albumin offers no mortality benefit in most resuscitation scenarios and is significantly more expensive than crystalloids 1, 2

  • The only narrow exception: albumin may be considered in septic patients who have already received substantial crystalloid volumes and remain unstable 2, 3


Balanced vs. Unbalanced Crystalloids: A Critical Distinction

Balanced crystalloids (Ringer's Lactate, Plasmalyte) are superior to 0.9% normal saline for resuscitation. 1, 2, 3

The Evidence by Clinical Scenario:

Hemorrhagic Shock:

  • Grade 2+ recommendation for balanced crystalloids over 0.9% NaCl to reduce mortality and adverse renal events 1, 2
  • This recommendation is particularly strong when large volumes (>5000 mL) are anticipated, as commonly occurs in trauma resuscitation 1
  • Observational data shows increased mortality with hyperchloremia after high-volume chloride-rich fluid administration 1
  • Balanced solutions consistently provide better acid-base balance 1

Sepsis and Septic Shock:

  • Balanced crystalloids are conditionally recommended over isotonic saline with low certainty of evidence 2, 3
  • The SMART study demonstrated reduced major adverse kidney events (MAKE 30: death, doubling of creatinine, or renal replacement therapy) with balanced solutions 1

General Critical Illness:

  • Balanced crystalloids are preferred to avoid hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, which negatively impacts renal perfusion, increases vasopressor requirements, and worsens outcomes 4

What NOT to Use

Hypertonic Saline:

Do not use 3% or 7.5% hypertonic saline solutions as first-line therapy in hemorrhagic shock (Grade 1- strong recommendation) 1

  • Multiple meta-analyses involving 2,932 patients showed no mortality benefit 1
  • No difference in fluid volume requirements, transfusion needs, or organ failure 1

Synthetic Colloids:

Absolutely avoid hydroxyethyl starches in all resuscitation scenarios 1, 2, 3

  • Associated with increased renal failure requiring replacement therapy 1
  • Increased bleeding risk and higher transfusion requirements 1
  • No improvement in mortality despite superior volume expansion capacity 1

Initial Resuscitation Volumes

Administer at least 30 mL/kg of crystalloids within the first 3 hours for patients with sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion (Grade 1C recommendation) 2, 3

  • This represents the salvage phase where fluid should be administered generously 5
  • Approximately 50% of fluid boluses fail to improve cardiac output as intended, so reassessment is critical 6

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

The Chloride Problem:

  • High chloride content in 0.9% saline causes hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, decreased kidney perfusion, extravascular fluid accumulation, and increased vasopressor requirements 4
  • This is particularly problematic when large volumes are administered 1

The Colloid Trap:

  • Despite colloids having 1.5 times the volume expansion capacity of crystalloids, this does not translate to improved outcomes 1
  • The risks (renal failure, bleeding, cost) outweigh any theoretical volume expansion benefits 1, 2

Monitoring Limitations:

  • Do not rely on central venous pressure (CVP) alone to guide fluid therapy—it has poor predictive value for fluid responsiveness 3
  • Clinical indicators like heart rate, blood pressure, and urine output may not detect early hypovolemia 5
  • Dynamic tests (pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation) can only be used in a small percentage of critically ill patients 5

Practical Algorithm for Fluid Selection

  1. First-line choice: Balanced crystalloid (Ringer's Lactate or Plasmalyte) 1, 2, 3

  2. Initial volume: 30 mL/kg for sepsis; titrate to clinical response in hemorrhagic shock 2, 3

  3. Reassess frequently: Use fluid challenge technique to determine ongoing requirements 2, 5

  4. If massive volumes needed (>5000 mL): Continue with balanced crystalloids, avoid switching to 0.9% saline 1

  5. Consider albumin only if: Septic patient requiring substantial crystalloid volumes after initial resuscitation 2, 3

  6. Never use: Hydroxyethyl starches, hypertonic saline as first-line, or albumin in hemorrhagic shock 1, 2

budget:budget_used 6961 193039

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Fluid Therapy in Critically Ill Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Fluid Management in Critically Ill Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Intraoperative Fluid Management in ESRD Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Fluid management in the critically ill.

Kidney international, 2019

Research

Assessing volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department.

Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2014

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.