Best Imaging for Kidney Stone Detection
Non-contrast CT (NCCT) of the abdomen and pelvis is the gold standard imaging test for diagnosing kidney stones, with sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 95%. 1, 2
Primary Recommendation: Low-Dose Non-Contrast CT
Use low-dose CT protocols (<3 mSv) as the first-line imaging modality for suspected kidney stones to minimize radiation exposure while maintaining excellent diagnostic accuracy (pooled sensitivity 97%, specificity 95%). 1, 2
Why Non-Contrast CT is Superior:
- Virtually all renal calculi are radiopaque on CT, allowing detection of even small stones without IV contrast 1
- Provides rapid acquisition with high spatial resolution and multiplanar reformation capabilities 1
- Accurately measures stone size and precisely depicts stone location within the ureter 1
- Detects secondary signs of complications including periureteral inflammation, perinephric inflammation, and ureteral dilatation 1, 2
- Helical (spiral) NCCT clearly shows where stones have become lodged in the ureter 1
Technical Optimization:
- Use thin (1-1.5 mm) axial slice images rather than thick (5 mm) coronal maximum intensity projections for optimal stone detection 1
- View images on bone window settings with magnified views and coronal reformations to improve measurement accuracy 1
- Stone location and size determination is crucial since more proximal and larger stones require higher intervention rates 1
Alternative First-Line Options
Ultrasound (US) of Kidneys and Bladder:
Consider ultrasound as the primary imaging modality in pregnant patients and children due to radiation concerns. 2, 3
- Sensitivity for stone detection is lower (24-57%) compared to CT, but sensitivity for detecting ureteral obstruction (hydronephrosis, ureterectasis, perinephric fluid) reaches up to 100% with specificity of 90% 2
- Adding color Doppler with twinkling artifact assessment improves sensitivity for small renal stones 2
- Combining ultrasound with plain radiography (KUB) improves diagnostic accuracy to 79-90% sensitivity 2
- In a randomized controlled trial, ultrasound and CT demonstrated equivalent diagnostic accuracy within the emergency department setting 4
What NOT to Use as First-Line Imaging
Contrast-Enhanced CT:
Avoid CT with IV contrast as first-line imaging because enhancing renal parenchyma may obscure stones within the collecting system. 1, 2 The American College of Radiology states unenhanced CT has higher sensitivity than contrast-enhanced CT for detecting small renal calculi. 5
Plain Radiography (KUB) Alone:
Limited sensitivity (29% overall, 72% for stones >5mm in proximal ureter) makes this inadequate as a standalone test. 2
MRI:
Has limited utility in stone detection and should only be considered when radiation must be avoided and ultrasound is inconclusive. 2
Intravenous Urography (IVU):
Lower sensitivity and specificity (87% and 94%) compared to non-contrast CT (96% and 100%). 2
Special Clinical Scenarios
Recurrent Stone Disease:
Limit the CT scan to the area of interest or use ultra-low-dose protocols to reduce cumulative radiation exposure. 1, 2
Pregnant Patients:
Ultrasonography is the imaging tool of choice due to radiation concerns. 1
Known Stone Disease Follow-up:
Plain KUB radiography is most helpful for evaluating interval stone growth in patients with known stone disease. 4
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely solely on ultrasound for detecting small stones (<5mm) as sensitivity decreases significantly 2
- Do not use contrast-enhanced CT as first-line imaging as it may lead to missed small stones 1, 2
- Do not ignore hydronephrosis on ultrasound even when stones are not visualized, as this indicates possible obstruction 2
- Be aware that ultra-low-dose protocols may miss stones <2mm in size 1
- CT can occasionally be deceiving due to motion artifact causing warping distortion that makes stones appear larger than actual size; correlation with KUB and ultrasound is critical 6