What are the ECG (electrocardiogram) criteria using the Q wave to confirm myocardial infarction (MI) and differentiate between old and new infarction?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

ECG Q Wave Criteria for Myocardial Infarction

Pathologic Q waves are defined as ≥0.03 seconds in duration and ≥0.1 mV (1 mm) deep in at least two contiguous leads, and these are pathognomonic of prior myocardial infarction in patients with ischemic heart disease. 1, 2

Specific Q Wave Criteria for Confirming Infarction

Standard Pathologic Q Wave Definition

  • Duration ≥0.03 seconds (30 ms) AND depth ≥0.1 mV (1 mm) in any two contiguous leads of a lead group 1, 2
  • QS complex (complete absence of R wave) in leads V2-V3 with duration ≥0.02 seconds is also pathologic 2
  • The specificity for MI diagnosis is greatest when Q waves occur in several leads or lead groupings 1, 2

Minor Q Wave Criteria

  • Q waves with duration 0.02-0.03 seconds that are 0.1 mV deep are suggestive of prior MI if accompanied by inverted T waves in the same lead group 1, 2
  • This combination of minor Q waves with T wave inversion increases diagnostic accuracy 1, 2

Normal Q Waves That Should NOT Be Interpreted as Pathologic

You must recognize these common pitfalls to avoid false-positive diagnoses:

  • QS complex in lead V1 is normal 1, 2
  • Q wave in lead III is normal if <0.03 sec and <25% of R wave amplitude when frontal QRS axis is between 30° and 0° 1, 2
  • Q wave in aVL is normal if frontal QRS axis is between 60° and 90° 1, 2
  • Septal Q waves (<0.03 sec and <25% of R-wave amplitude in leads I, aVL, aVF, and V4-V6) are physiologic 1, 2

Differentiating Old (Prior) vs New (Acute) Infarction

Key Approach: Compare Serial ECGs

The most reliable method to differentiate old from new infarction is comparison with previous ECGs - if Q waves are present on a prior tracing, they represent old infarction. 1, 3

Characteristics of Acute/New Infarction with Q Waves

When Q waves are present in the context of acute MI, you will see:

  • Associated ST-segment elevation in the same leads where Q waves appear 1, 3
  • Hyperacute T waves (tall, peaked) may precede Q wave development 1, 3
  • Dynamic ECG changes - serial ECGs at 15-30 minute intervals show evolution 3
  • Reciprocal ST depression in opposite leads 3
  • Q waves may develop within hours of coronary occlusion and can be transient if successful reperfusion occurs 4
  • Clinical correlation: ongoing chest pain, elevated cardiac biomarkers (troponin) 1

Characteristics of Old/Prior Infarction with Q Waves

When Q waves represent old MI, you will see:

  • Isolated Q waves without ST elevation 1
  • Stable T wave inversions (not dynamic) in the same leads, or normalized T waves 1
  • No reciprocal changes 1
  • Unchanged appearance on serial ECGs obtained 15-30 minutes apart 3
  • Clinical correlation: no acute chest pain, normal or baseline cardiac biomarkers 1
  • May be discovered as "silent MI" on routine ECG follow-up 1

Evolution Timeline of Q Waves

Understanding the temporal evolution helps differentiate timing:

  • Hyperacute T waves: appear within minutes of coronary occlusion 3
  • ST-segment elevation: develops within hours 3
  • Q waves: develop over hours to days in many (but not all) patients 3
  • T-wave inversion: may persist for weeks to months after acute event 3
  • Q wave regression: occurs in approximately 40% of patients by 24 months, particularly with successful early reperfusion 5

Critical Diagnostic Algorithm

When you encounter deep Q waves on ECG, follow this approach:

  1. Obtain prior ECGs immediately - if Q waves were present previously, this is old MI 1, 3

  2. If no prior ECG available, assess for acute features:

    • ST elevation in same leads as Q waves = likely acute/evolving MI 1, 3
    • ST depression, T wave changes = likely acute MI 1, 3
    • Isolated Q waves without ST-T changes = likely old MI 1
  3. Obtain serial ECGs at 15-30 minute intervals if patient is symptomatic - dynamic changes indicate acute process 3

  4. Check cardiac biomarkers (troponin) - elevated levels indicate acute or recent MI 1

  5. Consider cardiac imaging (echocardiography or CMR) to assess wall motion abnormalities and differentiate acute from chronic changes 1

Conditions That Mimic Pathologic Q Waves

Be aware that Q waves can occur without MI in these conditions:

  • Pre-excitation syndromes (Wolff-Parkinson-White) 1, 2
  • Cardiomyopathies (obstructive, dilated, stress, hypertrophic) 1, 2, 6
  • Cardiac amyloidosis 1, 2
  • Left bundle branch block (LBBB) - obscures Q waves 1
  • Left ventricular hypertrophy 1, 2
  • Myocarditis 1
  • Acute cor pulmonale 1

Enhanced Diagnostic Accuracy

Combining Q waves with other ECG findings significantly increases diagnostic accuracy:

  • Q waves + ST deviations in same leads = higher likelihood of MI 1, 2
  • Q waves + T wave inversions in same leads = higher likelihood of MI 1, 2
  • Pathologic Q waves in multiple lead groupings = highest specificity for MI 1, 2

Special Considerations

Q Wave Regression After Reperfusion

  • Early Q waves in acute MI may represent severely ischemic (not irreversibly damaged) myocardium that can be salvaged with thrombolytic therapy or primary PCI 4
  • Q wave regression occurs in approximately 40% of patients by 24 months and is associated with the largest improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction 5
  • Transient Q waves during acute phases may represent stunned myocardium 4

Clinical Significance

  • Pathologic Q waves indicate transmural myocardial infarction with necrosis 2
  • Larger infarct size (typically >6.2% of left ventricular mass) is associated with pathologic Q waves 2
  • Silent Q wave MI accounts for 9-37% of all non-fatal MI events and carries significantly increased mortality risk 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Q Waves and Myocardial Infarction

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

ECG Findings in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Q Wave in the Inferior Leads: There Is More Than Scar.

Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2015

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.