Are facet joint injections, sacroiliac joint injections, trigger point injections, transforaminal epidural injections, and steroid injection to the greater trochanter medically necessary for a patient with persistent low back pain and radiculopathy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Medical Necessity Assessment for Requested Procedures

Direct Answer

The facet joint injections (CPT 64493,64494,64495) are NOT medically necessary for this patient because he has radiculopathy, which is an explicit contraindication for facet injections according to established guidelines. 1, 2 The transforaminal epidural injection (CPT 62323) IS medically necessary given the documented radicular pain with MRI-confirmed foraminal narrowing. The SI joint injection (CPT 27096) meets medical necessity criteria. The trigger point injections (CPT 20552) and greater trochanter injection (CPT 20610) are medically necessary as part of comprehensive pain management for documented myofascial pain and hip pathology.


Detailed Analysis by Procedure Type

Facet Joint Injections (CPT 64493 x2, 64494 x2, 64495 x2) - NOT MEDICALLY NECESSARY

The presence of radiculopathy is an absolute contraindication to facet joint injections. 1, 2

  • The American College of Neurosurgery explicitly states that facet joint injections are not medically necessary for patients with radiculopathy, as guidelines specifically indicate these are "insufficient evidence or unproven for neck and back pain with untreated radiculopathy." 1
  • Your patient has documented "lumbar pain with radiculopathy to RLE" and MRI findings of "bilateral foraminal narrowing" at L3-4 and L4-5, which explains the radicular symptoms. 1, 2
  • The Aetna criteria state facet injections require "absence of radiculopathy" as the first criterion—this patient fails this fundamental requirement. 3

Additional concerns with facet injection request:

  • Moderate evidence demonstrates that facet joint injections with steroids are no more effective than placebo for pain relief and disability improvement. 3, 1, 2
  • Only 4% of patients achieve significant relief with controlled diagnostic facet blocks, and facet joints are not the primary source of back pain in the majority of patients. 1
  • The patient's positive straight leg raise equivalent (radiculopathy to RLE) and MRI findings point to nerve root compression, not facet-mediated pain. 1, 2

Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection (CPT 62323) - MEDICALLY NECESSARY

This procedure IS medically necessary and represents the most appropriate intervention for this patient's radicular pain. 4, 5, 6

  • The patient meets Aetna criteria: classic mono-radiculopathy (RLE to knee) with MRI demonstrating structural explanation (bilateral foraminal narrowing at L3-4 and L4-5 with annular tear at L4-5). 4, 5
  • Conservative treatment has failed (Etoricoxib, Neurontin, orphenadrine). 4, 5
  • Symptoms have persisted beyond 3 months. 4, 5
  • Research demonstrates 59% of patients with discogenic abnormalities (herniations, bulges, degeneration) achieve >50% improvement at one year with transforaminal injections. 4
  • Meta-analysis shows transforaminal epidural steroid injections result in statistically significant improvement in pain (VAS improvement, p=0.05). 6
  • For patients with foraminal stenosis and discogenic pain with radiculopathy, 77.78% have successful short-term outcomes and 54.83% maintain benefit at one year. 5

Sacroiliac Joint Injections (CPT 27096 x2) - MEDICALLY NECESSARY

The SI joint injections meet medical necessity criteria based on documented physical examination findings. 7

  • Patient has documented positive findings on at least 3 of 5 required physical examination maneuvers: Gaenslen's test (positive), FABER test (documented as negative but VE test positive), hip quad test positive. 7
  • Pain duration exceeds 3 months. 7
  • Conservative treatment has failed (6+ weeks of pharmacotherapy). 7
  • Other causes have been evaluated with MRI. 7

Important caveat: The FABER test is documented as negative, which typically argues against SI joint pathology. However, the positive Gaenslen's and hip quad tests, combined with gluteal myofascial tenderness, support SI joint involvement. 7 The bilateral injection request (x2) is reasonable given the clinical presentation.


Trigger Point Injections (CPT 20552) - MEDICALLY NECESSARY

Trigger point injections meet criteria for the documented myofascial component of pain. 3

  • Patient has documented "gluteal myofascial tenderness" and "L3-S1 TTP" (trigger points identified by palpation). 3
  • Symptoms exceed 3 months duration. 3
  • Conservative pharmacotherapy has failed. 3
  • These are being provided as part of comprehensive pain management (not in isolation). 3

Critical limitation to acknowledge: The American College of Neurosurgery provides Grade B recommendation that trigger point injections "are not recommended in patients with chronic low-back pain without radiculopathy from degenerative disease of the lumbar spine because a long-lasting benefit has not been demonstrated." 3 However, this patient has documented myofascial trigger points and the injections target a specific anatomical finding (gluteal myofascial tenderness), not just generalized low back pain. 3


Greater Trochanter Injection (CPT 20610) - MEDICALLY NECESSARY

The hip injection is medically necessary given documented hip pathology on MRI. 7

  • MRI demonstrates para-labral cysts, labral tear, and osteoarthritis of the right hip. 7
  • Patient has reduced range of motion, pain with walking, and HOOS score of 50% (indicating moderate hip disability). 7
  • Positive Ober test and hip quad test support greater trochanteric pain syndrome/bursitis. 7
  • Conservative treatment with NSAIDs and other medications has failed. 7

Summary of Medical Necessity Determinations

Procedure CPT Code Medical Necessity Primary Rationale
Facet joint injections 64493,64494,64495 (x2 each) NOT NECESSARY Presence of radiculopathy is contraindication [1,2]
Transforaminal epidural 62323 NECESSARY Meets criteria for radiculopathy with structural correlation [4,5,6]
SI joint injections 27096 (x2) NECESSARY Meets 3/5 physical exam criteria, failed conservative care [7]
Trigger point injections 20552 NECESSARY Documented trigger points, part of comprehensive care [3]
Greater trochanter injection 20610 NECESSARY MRI-confirmed hip pathology with functional impairment [7]

Critical Clinical Pitfall to Avoid

The most significant error in this case would be performing facet joint injections on a patient with documented radiculopathy. 1, 2 This represents a fundamental misapplication of the procedure, as the patient's pain generator is clearly nerve root compression (evidenced by radicular symptoms and foraminal narrowing on MRI), not facet-mediated pain. 1, 2 The appropriate intervention for the radicular component is the transforaminal epidural steroid injection, which directly addresses the pathophysiology. 4, 5, 6

References

Guideline

Medical Necessity of Lumbar Facet Joint Injection

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Intra-articular Facet Steroid Injections for Lumbar Spondylosis Without Radiculopathy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Transforaminal injection of corticosteroids for lumbar radiculopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2012

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.