Cefadroxil vs Cefixime: Spectrum and Clinical Usage
Cefadroxil is a first-generation cephalosporin with primarily gram-positive coverage and limited gram-negative activity, while cefixime is a third-generation cephalosporin with potent gram-negative activity but limited gram-positive coverage—they occupy fundamentally different therapeutic niches and are not interchangeable.
Spectrum of Activity
Cefadroxil (First-Generation)
- Gram-positive coverage: Good activity against Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae (penicillin-susceptible strains), and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus 1
- Gram-negative coverage: Limited to basic organisms; poor activity against Haemophilus influenzae and most Enterobacteriaceae 1
- Anaerobic coverage: Minimal to none 1
- Beta-lactamase stability: Poor—easily hydrolyzed by beta-lactamases 1
Cefixime (Third-Generation)
- Gram-negative coverage: Potent activity against H. influenzae (including beta-lactamase-producing strains), Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and most Enterobacteriaceae 1, 2
- Gram-positive coverage: Limited activity against S. pneumoniae (penicillin-susceptible only); no activity against staphylococci; may fail against even penicillin-susceptible pneumococci 1
- Drug-resistant S. pneumoniae (DRSP): No clinically significant activity 1
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Inactive 2
- Beta-lactamase stability: Resistant to hydrolysis by many beta-lactamases 2, 3
Clinical Usage Patterns
Cefadroxil Indications
- Skin and soft tissue infections caused by streptococci or staphylococci (community-acquired, non-MRSA) 1
- Pharyngitis/tonsillitis due to S. pyogenes 1
- Simple urinary tract infections in areas with low E. coli resistance 1
- Dosing advantage: Typically once or twice daily due to longer half-life among first-generation agents 1
Cefixime Indications
- Acute otitis media: Effective against H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae at 8 mg/kg daily 2
- Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis: When H. influenzae is suspected, though limited pneumococcal coverage is a concern 1
- Uncomplicated gonorrhea: Single-dose therapy for penicillinase-producing N. gonorrhoeae 2, 3
- Uncomplicated urinary tract infections: Alternative to amoxicillin or co-trimoxazole 2, 3
- Lower respiratory tract infections: When gram-negative pathogens predominate, though inadequate for empiric pneumonia due to poor pneumococcal coverage 2
- Dosing advantage: 3-hour elimination half-life permits once or twice daily administration 2, 3
Critical Clinical Distinctions
When Cefadroxil Fails
Cefadroxil is inappropriate for:
- Infections involving H. influenzae (respiratory tract infections, otitis media) 1
- Beta-lactamase-producing organisms 1
- Gram-negative urinary tract infections in areas with high resistance 1
- Any infection requiring gram-negative coverage 1
When Cefixime Fails
Cefixime is inappropriate for:
- Empiric community-acquired pneumonia (inadequate S. pneumoniae coverage, especially DRSP) 1
- Staphylococcal infections (skin/soft tissue, bacteremia) 1, 2
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections 2
- Anaerobic infections (Bacteroides fragilis) 1
- Enterococcal infections 1
Practical Algorithm for Selection
Choose Cefadroxil when:
- Confirmed or highly suspected gram-positive infection (streptococcal pharyngitis, simple cellulitis)
- No concern for beta-lactamase-producing organisms
- No gram-negative pathogen involvement expected
Choose Cefixime when:
- H. influenzae is confirmed or suspected (otitis media, sinusitis)
- Uncomplicated gonorrhea
- Gram-negative urinary tract infection
- BUT always ensure adequate gram-positive coverage is not needed first
Never substitute one for the other as they address opposite ends of the bacterial spectrum—cefadroxil targets gram-positives while cefixime targets gram-negatives 1, 2.
Adverse Effects
Both agents share similar cephalosporin class adverse effects, with diarrhea and stool changes being most common (up to 20% with cefixime), typically mild to moderate and transient 2, 3.