Blood Pressure Target for Cardiogenic Shock in Post-CABG Patients
Target a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of at least 65 mmHg, with strong consideration for higher targets (≥70 mmHg) in post-CABG cardiogenic shock patients, as higher MAP is associated with improved mortality and clinical outcomes in this population.
Primary MAP Target
- The minimum MAP target should be ≥65 mmHg using the lowest necessary dose of vasopressor therapy to maintain adequate organ perfusion 1
- This 65 mmHg threshold represents the established baseline for ensuring tissue perfusion pressure in shock states 2
- However, this target should be viewed as a floor rather than an optimal goal in cardiogenic shock 1
Evidence for Higher MAP Targets in Cardiogenic Shock
Recent evidence strongly suggests targeting MAP ≥70 mmHg in cardiogenic shock improves outcomes:
- In patients with cardiogenic shock treated with inotropes, achieving an average MAP ≥70 mmHg was associated with significantly better outcomes compared to MAP <70 mmHg 3
- The higher MAP group (≥70 mmHg) demonstrated:
Post-CABG Specific Considerations
Emergency CABG in cardiogenic shock requires aggressive hemodynamic optimization:
- Emergency CABG is recommended for cardiogenic shock patients when coronary anatomy is suitable, irrespective of time interval from MI to shock onset 1
- Management should target optimizing determinants of coronary arterial perfusion, including mean arterial pressure, to reduce perioperative myocardial ischemia and infarction 1
- During on-pump CABG procedures, maintaining MAP >60 mmHg is recommended as an absolute minimum 4
Vasopressor Strategy
Norepinephrine should be the first-line vasopressor:
- Norepinephrine is favored as first-line therapy to achieve MAP targets in cardiogenic shock 1
- Use the minimum necessary vasopressor dose to maintain the target MAP 1
- Alternative agents may be considered in specific circumstances:
Important Caveats
Caution is required with progressive escalation:
- While higher MAP targets appear beneficial, excessive vasopressor escalation carries risks 1
- Targeting MAP of 85 mmHg (compared to 65 mmHg) in septic shock resulted in significantly higher risk of arrhythmias, though this data is from septic rather than cardiogenic shock 1
- Continuous reassessment of clinical perfusion status is mandatory, as MAP alone does not guarantee adequate tissue perfusion 1
Monitoring Beyond MAP
Additional hemodynamic parameters should guide management:
- Document LV end-diastolic pressure before contrast administration, as elevated pressures are associated with increased mortality 1
- Monitor for signs of adequate organ perfusion beyond MAP alone 1
- Consider early mechanical ventilation if respiratory failure develops, as worsening hypoxemia and acidosis increase susceptibility to ventricular fibrillation and may increase mortality risk during revascularization 1
Clinical Algorithm
- Initial stabilization: Achieve MAP ≥65 mmHg with norepinephrine as first-line 1
- Target optimization: Aim for MAP ≥70 mmHg based on cardiogenic shock-specific outcome data 3
- Continuous assessment: Monitor end-organ perfusion markers, not just MAP 1
- Vasopressor titration: Use minimum necessary doses while achieving targets 1
- Consider mechanical support: If vasopressor requirements escalate excessively or hemodynamic instability persists despite initial measures 1