EBV Serology Interpretation and Management
Serological Interpretation
For diagnosing EBV infection status, use a three-marker approach: VCA-IgM, VCA-IgG, and EBNA-1 IgG, which allows interpretation of >95% of cases and provides clear differentiation between acute, recent, and past infection. 1, 2
Primary Acute Infection (Recent, <6 weeks)
- VCA-IgM positive (with or without VCA-IgG) + EBNA-1 IgG negative indicates acute primary infection 1, 3
- Heterophile antibodies (Monospot) can be used as initial screening but have ~10% false negative rate, particularly in children under 10 years 1
- EBNA-1 antibodies typically appear 1-2 months after primary infection and their absence confirms recent infection 1, 3
Past Infection (>6 weeks)
- VCA-IgM negative + VCA-IgG positive + EBNA-1 IgG positive indicates past infection 1, 3
- This pattern represents >90% of the adult population in most regions 4
Atypical Serological Patterns (~11-15% of cases)
When encountering atypical patterns, additional testing is required:
Isolated VCA-IgG positive (most common atypical pattern at 7.9%):
- Perform IgG avidity testing to distinguish acute from past infection 3, 5
- Low avidity = acute/recent infection; High avidity = past infection or secondary anti-EBNA-1-negative state 5
- Consider immunocompromised status, as 5-10% of immunocompromised patients never develop EBNA-1 antibodies despite infection 1, 4
All three markers positive (VCA-IgM + VCA-IgG + EBNA-1 IgG):
- May indicate recent infection (EBNA-1 appearing early) or reactivation 3
- Clinical correlation and follow-up serology in 2-4 weeks recommended 4
Isolated EBNA-1 IgG positive:
Management of Current EBV Infection
Immunocompetent Patients
Acyclovir and other antivirals have no proven benefit for infectious mononucleosis in immunocompetent hosts and are not recommended. 6
- Supportive care is the mainstay of treatment 6
- Corticosteroids may be indicated specifically for airway obstruction 6
- Monitor for complications including hepatosplenomegaly, neurological manifestations, and hematological abnormalities 6
Immunocompromised Patients (Post-Transplant, IBD on Immunosuppression)
In high-risk immunocompromised patients, prospective EBV DNA monitoring by quantitative PCR should be performed weekly starting within the first month and continuing for at least 4 months, with pre-emptive rituximab therapy for rising viral loads. 6
Risk Stratification for PTLD
High-risk features include: 6
- T-cell depletion therapy
- EBV donor/recipient mismatch (especially seronegative recipient)
- Cord blood transplantation
- Steroid-refractory GVHD
- EBV DNA >10^2.5 copies/mg DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells 6, 1
Monitoring Strategy
- Use quantitative PCR on whole blood, plasma, or serum (all acceptable) 6
- Frequency: At least weekly, with EBV doubling time as short as 56 hours requiring more frequent monitoring if levels rising 6
- Threshold for intervention: Rising viral loads warrant pre-emptive therapy before clinical disease develops 6
Pre-emptive and Treatment Approaches
- Rituximab is the primary intervention for rising EBV DNA-emia or proven PTLD 6
- Reduction of immunosuppression when feasible 6
- For proven PTLD: tissue diagnosis via biopsy with EBER in situ hybridization (high sensitivity/specificity) is preferred over immunohistochemistry 6
- PET-CT staging using Lugano classification for extent of disease 6
Special Populations
For IBD patients on immunomodulators: Consider EBV IgG screening before initiating thiopurines, with preference for anti-TNF monotherapy in seronegative patients to reduce lymphoma risk. 6
Key Diagnostic Pitfalls
- False positives: VCA-IgM can be falsely positive in leukemia, pancreatic carcinoma, CMV infection, and other viral hepatitis 1
- False negatives: Heterophile antibodies have poor sensitivity in children <10 years; use specific EBV antibodies instead 1
- Immunocompromised patients: May never develop EBNA-1 antibodies (5-10% of cases), making isolated VCA-IgG pattern common 1, 5
- EBV DNA detection alone: Blood PCR positivity without clinical correlation is insufficient for PTLD diagnosis; tissue confirmation required 6