What are the alternatives to Eliquis (apixaban) for blood thinning, such as Krill oil?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Alternatives to Eliquis (Apixaban) for Anticoagulation

Krill oil is not a suitable alternative to Eliquis for therapeutic anticoagulation, and no dietary supplement can replace prescription anticoagulants for conditions requiring blood thinning. The evidence-based alternatives to Eliquis are other prescription anticoagulants, not over-the-counter supplements.

Evidence-Based Prescription Alternatives

Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs)

For patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, the proven alternatives to apixaban include dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban, all of which have demonstrated efficacy in large randomized controlled trials 1.

Dabigatran (150 mg twice daily):

  • Reduced stroke and systemic embolism by 35% compared with warfarin in the RE-LY trial 1
  • The 110 mg twice daily dose was non-inferior to warfarin with 20% fewer major bleeding events 1
  • Both doses significantly reduced hemorrhagic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage 1
  • Should not be used in patients with CrCl <15 mL/min 1

Rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily):

  • Demonstrated efficacy in the ROCKET-AF trial for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation 1
  • Dose reduction to 15 mg once daily required if CrCl 30-49 mL/min 1
  • Should not be used if CrCl <15 mL/min 1
  • Has convenient once-daily dosing compared to apixaban's twice-daily regimen 1

Edoxaban (60 mg once daily):

  • Evaluated in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial with dose reduction to 30 mg for specific criteria 1
  • Requires dose adjustment if CrCl 30-50 mL/min, body weight ≤60 kg, or concomitant use of certain medications 1

Vitamin K Antagonists

Warfarin remains a viable alternative, particularly in patients with severe renal impairment where DOACs may be contraindicated 1.

  • Requires regular INR monitoring and dose adjustments 1
  • Target INR typically 2-3 for most indications 1
  • More drug-food interactions and slower onset/offset compared to DOACs 1

Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH)

For cancer-associated thrombosis, LMWH is preferred over DOACs including apixaban 1.

  • Suggested over vitamin K antagonists, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban for initial and long-term treatment in cancer patients 1
  • Requires subcutaneous injection rather than oral administration 1

Why Krill Oil Is Not an Alternative

There is no clinical evidence supporting krill oil or any omega-3 supplement as a replacement for prescription anticoagulants like Eliquis. The guidelines and major clinical trials exclusively evaluate prescription anticoagulants 1.

Critical distinctions:

  • Prescription anticoagulants have proven efficacy in reducing stroke risk by 21-66% in randomized controlled trials 1
  • Krill oil has mild antiplatelet effects at best, which are insufficient for therapeutic anticoagulation
  • No regulatory approval exists for krill oil as an anticoagulant
  • Using krill oil instead of prescribed anticoagulation would leave patients unprotected from thrombotic events

Comparative Safety Profiles

Apixaban demonstrated superior safety compared to warfarin, with 31% reduction in major bleeding and 11% reduction in all-cause mortality in the ARISTOTLE trial 1.

When comparing DOACs:

  • All DOACs reduce intracranial hemorrhage compared to warfarin 1
  • Apixaban showed the lowest major bleeding rates among DOACs in head-to-head trial comparisons 1
  • Dabigatran 150 mg had similar major bleeding to warfarin, while the 110 mg dose had 20% less 1

Clinical Decision-Making Algorithm

Step 1: Assess renal function 1

  • CrCl ≥50 mL/min: All DOACs are options
  • CrCl 30-49 mL/min: Dose-adjusted rivaroxaban or edoxaban; dabigatran with caution
  • CrCl 15-29 mL/min: Consider warfarin; apixaban may be considered but not established
  • CrCl <15 mL/min: Warfarin only; DOACs contraindicated

Step 2: Consider patient-specific factors 1

  • Age ≥80 years, weight ≤60 kg, or serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL: May require dose-adjusted apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily) or edoxaban 1
  • Active cancer: Prefer LMWH over any oral anticoagulant 1
  • Prior gastrointestinal bleeding: Consider dabigatran or apixaban over rivaroxaban 1

Step 3: Assess adherence capability 1

  • Twice-daily dosing required: Apixaban, dabigatran
  • Once-daily dosing: Rivaroxaban, edoxaban
  • Unable to take oral medications reliably: Consider LMWH 1

Important Caveats

The safety and efficacy of combining any DOAC with antiplatelet agents have not been established 1. In the APPRAISE-2 trial, adding apixaban to dual antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome resulted in unacceptably high major bleeding rates without reducing ischemic events 2.

Reversal agents differ by anticoagulant 1:

  • Apixaban/rivaroxaban: Andexanet alfa preferred; PCC if unavailable 1
  • Dabigatran: Idarucizumab (5 g IV) is the specific reversal agent 1
  • Warfarin: Vitamin K and four-factor PCC 1

Never substitute prescription anticoagulants with supplements or over-the-counter products, as this exposes patients to preventable strokes, systemic embolism, and death from undertreated thrombotic conditions.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Apixaban with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome.

The New England journal of medicine, 2011

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.