What are the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings for cell count, differential, proteins, glucose, and lactate in neurosyphilis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

CSF Findings in Neurosyphilis

Neurosyphilis typically presents with mild mononuclear pleocytosis (10-200 cells/µL), normal or mildly elevated protein concentration, and a reactive CSF-VDRL, though the absence of these findings does not exclude the diagnosis. 1

Cell Count and Differential

  • White blood cell count is typically elevated at 10-200 cells/µL with a predominantly mononuclear (lymphocytic-plasmocytic) cell reaction 1, 2
  • A CSF WBC >10 cells/µL combined with reactive CSF-VDRL strongly supports the diagnosis of neurosyphilis 1
  • The WBC count is a sensitive indicator of inflammatory activity in the CNS and serves as a useful marker for treatment effectiveness 2
  • Important caveat: HIV infection itself can cause mild mononuclear CSF pleocytosis (5-15 cells/µL), particularly in patients with CD4+ counts >500 cells/µL, which can complicate interpretation 1

Protein

  • Protein levels are typically normal or mildly elevated in neurosyphilis 1
  • Elevated protein alone, without other CSF abnormalities (reactive VDRL or elevated WBC), should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis 1
  • Protein serves as an indicator of inflammatory activity and can be used to monitor treatment response, though the response may be slower in late forms like paresis and tabes 2
  • IgG index is often strongly positive with oligoclonal bands present 2

Glucose

  • Glucose levels are generally normal in neurosyphilis 3
  • Glucose concentration is the most unreliable parameter for diagnosing neurosyphilis (AUC=0.445, P=0.395) and should not be relied upon for diagnostic purposes 3

Lactate

  • No specific lactate findings are described in the guideline literature for neurosyphilis diagnosis
  • The available guidelines do not include lactate as a standard diagnostic parameter for neurosyphilis 1, 4, 5, 6

Diagnostic Algorithm

The diagnosis requires a combination of findings rather than any single test:

  • Reactive CSF-VDRL (highly specific but only 49-87% sensitive) plus CSF WBC >10 cells/µL provides the strongest diagnostic support 1, 5
  • A nonreactive CSF-VDRL does NOT exclude neurosyphilis due to limited sensitivity 1, 5
  • CSF treponemal tests (FTA-ABS) are sensitive but not specific; a nonreactive test excludes neurosyphilis, but a reactive test does not confirm it 1, 6
  • The combination of CSF-TRUST (or VDRL), nucleated cell count, and total protein has the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC=0.989) for distinguishing neurosyphilis from latent CNS syphilis infection 3

Critical Pitfalls

  • Never base the diagnosis solely on elevated CSF protein without reactive VDRL or elevated WBC 1
  • Blood contamination during lumbar puncture can affect CSF-VDRL results and must be considered 5
  • In HIV-infected patients, the diagnostic threshold of >10 WBC/µL may need adjustment given baseline HIV-related pleocytosis 1
  • False-negative serologic tests can occur; if clinical suspicion is high despite negative serology, pursue alternative diagnostic procedures 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Syphilis Diagnosis Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnóstico y Seguimiento de Neurosífilis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnosing and Treating Neurosyphilis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.