In stroke cases with large vessel occlusion and no signs of hemorrhage on non-contrast Computed Tomography (CT), should the immediate next step be Intravenous (IV) thrombolysis with alteplase (tissue plasminogen activator) or Computed Tomography (CT) angiography?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Immediate Management of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke After Non-Contrast CT

In patients with suspected large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke presenting within 6 hours and no hemorrhage on non-contrast CT, both CT angiography (CTA) and IV thrombolysis should be performed immediately and simultaneously—do not delay either intervention. 1

The Optimal Workflow: Parallel Processing, Not Sequential

The Canadian Stroke Best Practice guidelines explicitly state that patients potentially eligible for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) within 6 hours should undergo immediate brain imaging with both non-contrast CT AND CT angiography without delay, performed from arch-to-vertex to identify large vessel occlusions. 1 This is Level A evidence and represents the highest standard of care.

Key Principle: Do Not Choose Between Them

The critical error to avoid is treating this as an "either/or" decision. The evidence strongly supports that:

  • IV alteplase should be initiated immediately if the patient meets eligibility criteria (within 4.5 hours, no contraindications), even when LVO is suspected and mechanical thrombectomy is being considered. 2, 3
  • CTA should be obtained without delay to identify the LVO and plan for EVT. 1
  • Never wait to assess clinical response to IV alteplase before proceeding with catheter angiography for mechanical thrombectomy, as any delay worsens outcomes. 2, 3

The Evidence-Based Algorithm

For Patients Presenting Within 6 Hours:

  1. Complete non-contrast CT to exclude hemorrhage 1

  2. Immediately proceed to CTA (arch-to-vertex) while simultaneously:

    • Checking blood glucose (the only test that must precede alteplase) 2, 3
    • Lowering blood pressure below 185/110 mmHg if elevated 2, 3
    • Preparing IV alteplase 2, 3
  3. Administer IV alteplase (0.9 mg/kg, max 90 mg) as soon as eligibility is confirmed, ideally within 30 minutes of arrival (door-to-needle time) 2, 3

  4. Review CTA results to confirm LVO 1

  5. Proceed directly to mechanical thrombectomy if LVO is confirmed, without waiting to see if alteplase works 2, 3

Why Both Interventions Are Essential:

IV alteplase provides early recanalization in 41% of LVO patients, significantly improving outcomes even when mechanical thrombectomy is planned. 4 In the ESCAPE trial, early recanalization with alteplase was associated with nearly double the rate of good functional outcomes (adjusted risk ratio 1.9). 4

CTA is mandatory because it identifies the exact location of the occlusion, allows assessment of collateral circulation, and enables procedural planning for EVT. 1 The multiphase CTA protocol provides information about vessel tortuosity and collateral status that directly impacts treatment decisions. 1

Time-Specific Considerations

Within 0-4.5 Hours:

  • IV alteplase is strongly recommended (Level A evidence) 2, 3
  • CTA should be obtained simultaneously to identify LVO 1
  • Target door-to-needle time <60 minutes (ideally 30 minutes) 2, 3

Within 4.5-6 Hours:

  • CTA is essential to identify LVO candidates for EVT 1
  • IV alteplase may still be considered in select patients based on advanced imaging 5
  • Mechanical thrombectomy remains highly effective 2, 3

Beyond 6 Hours (6-24 Hours):

  • Advanced imaging (CT perfusion or MRI-DWI) is required to assess ischemic core and penumbra 1, 2, 3
  • Patients with small core and large penumbra or severe clinical deficit remain EVT candidates 2, 3, 5

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not delay CTA to give alteplase first. The imaging can be obtained while preparing the medication. 1

Do not delay alteplase to wait for CTA results. If the patient is within the thrombolysis window and has no contraindications, start alteplase immediately. 2, 3

Do not observe the patient after alteplase to assess clinical response before proceeding to angiography—this delay significantly worsens outcomes. 2, 3

Do not skip CTA in suspected LVO cases. Even if alteplase is given, you need vascular imaging to determine EVT eligibility. 1

Special Circumstances

Primary Stroke Centers Without CTA Capability:

These centers should complete non-contrast CT, administer IV alteplase if appropriate, and then rapidly transfer the patient to a comprehensive stroke center for CTA and potential EVT. 1 Do not delay transfer waiting to see if alteplase works.

Patients on Anticoagulation:

  • Warfarin with INR ≤1.7: IV alteplase may be reasonable 2
  • Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): Should not routinely receive alteplase, but EVT should still be considered 2

The Bottom Line

The modern approach to LVO stroke is aggressive parallel processing, not sequential decision-making. Both IV thrombolysis and vascular imaging with CTA should occur simultaneously and urgently. 1, 2, 3 This "bridging therapy" approach—IV alteplase followed immediately by mechanical thrombectomy without waiting for clinical response—represents the current standard of care and maximizes the chance of good functional outcomes while minimizing mortality. 2, 3, 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Guidelines for Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Acute Ischemic Stroke Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Acute imaging for evidence-based treatment of ischemic stroke.

Current opinion in neurology, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.