Is cervical artificial disc arthroplasty (CPT code 22856) and microsurgery add-on (CPT code 69990) medically necessary for a patient with a small, asymptomatic carotid aneurysm (I72.0)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Medical Necessity Determination: Cervical Disc Arthroplasty and Microsurgery for Carotid Aneurysm

Direct Answer

The requested procedures (CPT 22856 - cervical artificial disc arthroplasty and CPT 69990 - microsurgery add-on) are NOT medically necessary for diagnosis I72.0 (carotid artery aneurysm) as there is a complete mismatch between the diagnosis and the procedures being requested.

Critical Analysis of the Case

Fundamental Procedural-Diagnostic Mismatch

  • CPT 22856 is a cervical spine procedure for total disc arthroplasty involving discectomy and end plate preparation of the cervical intervertebral disc, which has absolutely no relationship to treating a carotid artery aneurysm 1

  • CPT 69990 (operating microscope add-on) is considered an integral part of spinal surgery and is not separately reimbursable according to Aetna policy, and more importantly, is irrelevant to carotid aneurysm treatment 1

  • The diagnosis I72.0 (aneurysm of carotid artery) requires vascular interventions, not spinal procedures 2, 3, 4

Appropriate Management for the Actual Diagnosis

The clinical documentation describes a 64-year-old female with a small (4.8 x 3.6 mm) unruptured right cavernous carotid aneurysm that was incidentally discovered. Based on established guidelines:

Conservative Management is Indicated

  • Small aneurysms <5mm should be managed conservatively in virtually all cases according to neurosurgical guidelines 1

  • The annual rupture risk for a cavernous carotid aneurysm of this size is approximately 0.1%, making aggressive intervention unjustified 5

  • Asymptomatic patients with small aneurysms require observation, not surgical intervention 1

Appropriate Interventions if Treatment Were Needed

If this aneurysm required treatment (which it does not at this size), the appropriate procedures would be:

  • Endovascular coiling or flow diverter placement (which was actually performed per the operative report showing Elite flow diverter 4.25 x 15mm deployment) 1

  • Microsurgical clipping for accessible anterior circulation aneurysms in young, low-risk patients 1

  • CPT codes 61624 (endovascular surgery), 75894 (transcatheter therapy imaging), and 36217 (selective catheter placement) as documented in the related case, NOT cervical disc procedures 1

Inpatient Stay Assessment

  • The diagnostic angiogram for a small, asymptomatic carotid aneurysm does not meet MCG criteria for inpatient admission 1

  • MCG Neurology criteria require cerebral aneurysm with need for IV antihypertensive agents, sedation for suspected leak, external ventricular drainage, or emergent surgical evaluation - none of which apply to this stable, incidental finding 1

  • Outpatient diagnostic angiography is appropriate for evaluating small, asymptomatic aneurysms 5

Recommendation Summary

Non-certification is appropriate for:

  1. CPT 22856 (cervical disc arthroplasty) - completely unrelated to carotid aneurysm diagnosis 1

  2. CPT 69990 (microsurgery add-on) - not separately reimbursable for spinal procedures and irrelevant to vascular pathology 1

  3. Inpatient admission - not medically necessary for diagnostic evaluation of small, asymptomatic carotid aneurysm 1, 5

What Should Have Been Done

  • Optimal medical therapy with risk factor modification (blood pressure control, antiplatelet therapy, statin therapy) 5

  • Surveillance imaging to monitor for aneurysm growth 5

  • Outpatient diagnostic angiography if detailed characterization was needed 1, 5

  • If intervention were truly indicated, endovascular treatment with flow diversion (which appears to have actually been performed based on the operative note) using appropriate CPT codes 1, 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Differentiated treatment of aneurysms of the extracranial carotid artery.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery, 2005

Guideline

Management of Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.