What is the target airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) for extubation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Airway Occlusion Pressure (P0.1) Goals for Extubation

For successful extubation, target a P0.1 ≤4 cm H₂O, as values above 6 cm H₂O predict weaning failure, while values at or below 4 cm H₂O indicate likely extubation success. 1

Evidence-Based P0.1 Thresholds

The ATS/ERS guidelines establish clear cutoff values for P0.1 in predicting extubation outcomes:

  • P0.1 ≤4 cm H₂O: Suggests weaning is likely to be successful 1
  • P0.1 >6 cm H₂O: Indicates discontinuation of mechanical ventilation is likely to be unsuccessful 1
  • P0.1 between 4-6 cm H₂O: Represents an intermediate zone requiring additional assessment parameters 1

Clinical Application Algorithm

Step 1: Measure P0.1 During Pre-Extubation Assessment

  • Measure P0.1 during spontaneous breathing trial or low-level pressure support (5-8 cm H₂O) 1
  • The measurement reflects respiratory drive and neuromuscular output, not just inspiratory center activity 1
  • Modern ventilators can measure P0.1 automatically without additional equipment 1, 2

Step 2: Interpret P0.1 in Context

High P0.1 (>6 cm H₂O) indicates:

  • Enhanced respiratory center activity and increased work of breathing 1
  • High risk of extubation failure - delay extubation and address underlying causes 1
  • May reflect increased respiratory load, muscle weakness, or inadequate ventilatory support 1

Low P0.1 (≤4 cm H₂O) indicates:

  • Appropriate respiratory drive with manageable work of breathing 1
  • Favorable conditions for extubation success 1
  • Proceed with extubation if other readiness criteria are met 3

Intermediate P0.1 (4-6 cm H₂O) requires:

  • Additional assessment with maximum inspiratory pressure (PiMax) if available 1
  • Evaluation for risk factors: upper airway obstruction, residual pulmonary disease, muscle weakness 1
  • Consider prophylactic noninvasive ventilation after extubation 4

Step 3: Post-Extubation Monitoring

  • Measure P0.1 at 1 hour post-extubation to detect early respiratory distress 5
  • P0.1 >4.2 cm H₂O at 1 hour post-extubation predicts respiratory failure requiring reintubation 5
  • P0.1 ≤1.8 cm H₂O at 1 hour post-extubation indicates stable respiratory status 5

Critical Caveats and Limitations

Factors That Affect P0.1 Accuracy

  • Dynamic hyperinflation and intrinsic PEEP: P0.1 measured as subatmospheric pressure at 0.1 seconds underestimates true respiratory effort, as it neglects the work required to overcome PEEPi 1
  • Upper airway resistance: In patients with abnormal airway resistance breathing through intact upper airways, P0.1 may underestimate true values due to long time constants 1
  • Endotracheal tube presence: In intubated patients, the rigid ETT bypassing the compliant upper airway allows P0.1 to more accurately reflect esophageal pressure changes 1
  • Breath-to-breath variability: P0.1 shows significant variability between breaths, requiring averaging of multiple measurements 1, 2
  • Expiratory muscle activity: Active expiration increases P0.1 variability and generates unreliable values 1

When P0.1 Alone Is Insufficient

P0.1 should not be used in isolation for extubation decisions. A low P0.1 may reflect:

  • Reduced respiratory center output 1
  • Deterioration in neural pathways to respiratory muscles 1
  • Impaired electromechanical coupling 1
  • Impaired pressure-generating capacity of inspiratory muscles 1

Combine P0.1 with:

  • Rapid shallow breathing index (f/VT ratio <105 breaths/min/L) 1
  • Cuff leak test for airway patency 3
  • Maximum inspiratory pressure (PiMax >25 cm H₂O in high-risk patients) 1
  • Hemodynamic stability and adequate oxygenation (FiO₂ ≤0.5, PEEP ≤6 cm H₂O) 3

Special Populations

Pediatric Patients

  • P0.1 and P0.1/P0.1max are the most useful airway pressure measurements for predicting extubation failure in children 6
  • Children who fail extubation demonstrate lower P0.1 values and lower P0.1/P0.1max ratios 6
  • The receiver operating characteristic curve area for P0.1 in predicting pediatric extubation failure is 0.76 6
  • Combine P0.1 assessment with air leak pressure measurement (risk if >25 cm H₂O for cuffed ETT) 3

COPD Patients

  • Measure P0.1 both before and 1 hour after extubation in COPD patients 5
  • Post-extubation P0.1 >4.2 cm H₂O strongly predicts hypercapnic respiratory insufficiency requiring reintubation 5
  • Consider prophylactic noninvasive ventilation if P0.1 is in the intermediate range (4-6 cm H₂O) 4

Measurement Technique

  • P0.1 is measured as the decrease in airway pressure at 0.1 seconds after commencement of a tidal inspiratory effort against an occluded airway 1
  • The occlusion must occur exactly at the point of zero flow, typically by closing the inspiratory line during exhalation 1
  • Patients must be unable to anticipate occlusions, which should be performed silently and unexpectedly 1
  • Most modern ventilators have integrated P0.1 measurement capabilities that automatically perform occlusions 1, 2
  • The measurement correlates well with esophageal pressure-time product (within-subjects R² = 0.8) 7

Performance Characteristics for Detecting Injurious Effort

  • P0.1 >3.5 cm H₂O: 80% sensitive and 77% specific for detecting high inspiratory effort (≥200 cm H₂O·s·min⁻¹) 7
  • P0.1 ≤1.0 cm H₂O: 100% sensitive and 92% specific for low effort (≤50 cm H₂O·s·min⁻¹) 7
  • Area under ROC curve for detecting potentially high effort: 0.81 7
  • Area under ROC curve for detecting potentially low effort: 0.92 7

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Extubation Readiness Assessment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Assessment of respiratory drive and muscle function in the pediatric intensive care unit and prediction of extubation failure.

Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2000

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.