Is it better to change the antidepressant or add an augmentor, such as (antipsychotic) aripiprazole (Abilify) or (atypical antipsychotic) quetiapine (Seroquel), in a patient with inadequate response to their current treatment?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment Strategy for Inadequate Antidepressant Response

Both switching antidepressants and augmenting with atypical antipsychotics show similar efficacy for treatment-resistant depression, but the evidence shows no clear superiority of one strategy over the other. Given this equipoise, the choice should be guided by prior treatment history, side effect burden, and specific clinical features 1.

Evidence-Based Decision Algorithm

When to Consider Switching Antidepressants

  • Moderate-quality evidence shows no difference in response or remission rates when switching from one second-generation antidepressant (SGA) to another (bupropion vs. sertraline vs. venlafaxine) 1.

  • Switch if the current antidepressant is poorly tolerated or causing significant adverse effects (sexual dysfunction, weight gain, sedation), as switching allows you to select an agent with a more favorable side effect profile 1.

  • Switch if there has been minimal or no response after 6-8 weeks of adequate dosing, particularly if this is the first antidepressant trial 1.

When to Consider Augmentation with Atypical Antipsychotics

  • Augmentation with aripiprazole or quetiapine shows efficacy when added to an existing antidepressant in patients with inadequate response 2, 3, 4.

  • Aripiprazole augmentation demonstrates response rates superior to placebo (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.63) but carries risks of weight gain and extrapyramidal symptoms 4.

  • Quetiapine augmentation shows symptom reduction compared to placebo in both monotherapy (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.66) and augmentation (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.90), though sedation is common 4.

  • Consider augmentation if the patient has had partial response to the current antidepressant (some improvement but not remission), as this suggests the medication has some benefit worth building upon 1.

  • Consider augmentation if psychotic features are present, as this may favor aripiprazole selection 5.

Comparative Considerations

Efficacy Evidence

  • Low-quality evidence shows no difference in response or remission between augmenting with another antidepressant (bupropion or buspirone) versus switching to a different antidepressant 1.

  • Augmentation with bupropion decreases depression severity more than buspirone augmentation, though both show similar response and remission rates 1.

  • Switching to cognitive therapy shows no difference compared to switching antidepressants, providing another alternative if pharmacotherapy has been inadequate 1.

Safety and Tolerability Profile

  • Atypical antipsychotic augmentation carries increased risk of metabolic side effects: weight gain, diabetes risk, and hyperprolactinemia (particularly with risperidone and olanzapine) 2, 3, 4.

  • Aripiprazole has lower rates of metabolic side effects compared to quetiapine or olanzapine but higher rates of akathisia and extrapyramidal symptoms 3, 4.

  • Quetiapine causes significant sedation but may be beneficial if insomnia is a prominent feature 4.

  • Switching antidepressants avoids polypharmacy and the additive side effect burden of multiple medications 1.

Clinical Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Ensure adequate trial duration (6-8 weeks) and dosing before declaring treatment failure, as premature switching or augmentation may miss delayed response 1.

  • Monitor closely for suicidal ideation within 1-2 weeks of any medication change, as risk increases during treatment transitions 1.

  • Avoid using atypical antipsychotics as first-line monotherapy for depression unless psychotic features are present, as they are FDA-approved primarily for augmentation 6, 2.

  • Consider that patients with more chronic, severe depression profiles (comorbid PTSD, diabetes, psychotic features, longer hospitalizations) may be more likely to receive aripiprazole in clinical practice 5.

  • Discontinuation rates due to adverse events are lower with bupropion augmentation compared to buspirone (moderate-quality evidence) 1.

Practical Approach

If the patient has had minimal response (<25% improvement): Switch to a different antidepressant class 1.

If the patient has had partial response (25-50% improvement): Consider augmentation with aripiprazole (2-5 mg initially, up to 15 mg) or quetiapine XR (150-300 mg) 6, 2, 3, 4.

If tolerability is the primary issue: Switch to an antidepressant with a different side effect profile (e.g., bupropion for sexual dysfunction, mirtazapine for insomnia) 1.

If metabolic concerns exist: Favor aripiprazole over quetiapine or olanzapine, or consider switching antidepressants rather than augmenting 2, 3, 4.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.