Laboratory Assessment for Chronic Heart Failure
When assessing a patient with chronic CHF, you should routinely check: hemoglobin/WBC, sodium, potassium, urea, creatinine with eGFR, liver function tests (bilirubin, AST, ALT, GGTP), glucose, HbA1c, TSH, iron studies (ferritin, TSAT/TIBC), and natriuretic peptides. 1
Core Laboratory Panel (Class I Recommendation)
The European Society of Cardiology provides the most comprehensive and recent guideline framework for laboratory assessment in chronic heart failure:
Hematologic Tests
- Complete blood count including hemoglobin and white blood cell count to identify anemia, which can exacerbate heart failure symptoms and worsen outcomes 1, 2
Renal and Electrolyte Assessment
- Sodium, potassium, urea, and creatinine with estimated GFR are essential for evaluating renal function, which directly impacts medication dosing, prognosis, and fluid management 1, 2
- These values require serial monitoring, especially after initiating or adjusting doses of diuretics, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or aldosterone antagonists 2
Metabolic Assessment
- Glucose and HbA1c to identify diabetes, which is both a common comorbidity and risk factor for worse outcomes in heart failure 1, 2
- Lipid profile for cardiovascular risk stratification 2, 3
Hepatic Function
- Liver function tests including bilirubin, AST, ALT, and GGTP to evaluate hepatic congestion from right heart failure and assess for underlying liver disease 1, 2
- Even "normal range" LFT values have prognostic significance—lower albumin and alanine transaminase, along with higher aspartate transaminase and alkaline phosphatase, are independently associated with decreased survival 4
Endocrine Assessment
- Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) to rule out thyroid disorders that can mimic or exacerbate heart failure 1, 2
Iron Status
- Ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT/TIBC) to identify iron deficiency, which is common in heart failure and impacts symptoms and outcomes even without anemia 1, 2
Biomarkers (Class IIa Recommendation)
Natriuretic Peptides
- BNP or NT-proBNP should be considered for risk stratification, establishing prognosis, and monitoring disease progression and response to therapy 1, 2
- For chronic/non-acute presentations, the optimum exclusion cut-off is 125 pg/mL for NT-proBNP and 35 pg/mL for BNP 1
Important caveats: BNP/NT-proBNP can be falsely elevated in advanced age, renal dysfunction, atrial fibrillation, and pulmonary hypertension, and falsely low in obesity and HFpEF 2
Cardiac Troponin
- Troponin levels may be useful for determining prognosis or disease severity and identifying potential ischemic etiology 2, 5
Additional Testing Based on Clinical Suspicion (Class IIa)
When specific etiologies are suspected, consider:
- Hemochromatosis screening when iron overload is suspected 2, 3
- HIV testing in patients with risk factors or unexplained cardiomyopathy 2, 3
- Rheumatologic disease testing when clinical suspicion exists 2, 3
- Amyloidosis testing in unexplained HFpEF, particularly in older patients 2, 3
Serial Monitoring Strategy
Renal function and electrolytes require regular monitoring in the following situations 2:
- After initiation or dose adjustment of diuretics, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or aldosterone antagonists
- During episodes of acute illness (especially with sodium/water loss from diarrhea or vomiting)
- In patients with severe heart failure requiring frequent medication adjustments
- When NSAIDs or other drugs affecting renal function are started or adjusted 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Don't dismiss "normal range" LFT values—they still provide independent prognostic information, with mortality increasing at lower albumin/ALT and higher AST/alkaline phosphatase levels even within normal ranges 4
- Don't rely solely on natriuretic peptides—they have limitations in obesity, flash pulmonary edema, and HFpEF 2
- Don't forget urinalysis—it detects proteinuria and renal abnormalities contributing to fluid retention 2, 3
- Monitor for hyponatremia, worsening renal function, and hyperkalemia—these laboratory abnormalities commonly complicate heart failure management 2