What is the risk of pulmonary embolism after COVID-19 infection?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Risk of Pulmonary Embolism After COVID-19 Infection

The risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) after COVID-19 infection is substantially elevated, with rates ranging from 2.4% to 35% during hospitalization depending on disease severity, and this heightened thrombotic risk persists for at least one month post-recovery. 1, 2

Acute Phase Risk (During Active Infection)

Hospitalized Non-ICU Patients

  • The cumulative incidence of symptomatic PE ranges from 2.4% to 9.2% at 14 days in hospitalized patients receiving standard thromboprophylaxis 1
  • This represents a multi-fold higher risk compared to typical acutely ill medical inpatients (0.3-1.0% without prophylaxis) 1
  • Even patients with mild COVID-19 symptoms can develop PE, including those who are negative by pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria 3

ICU/Critically Ill Patients

  • PE incidence in ICU patients ranges dramatically from 8.1% to 35% depending on the study 1
  • One study reported PE in 65 of 184 (35%) ICU patients, with an additional 25% having isolated proximal PE 1
  • Another cohort found 25 of 150 (17%) ICU patients developed proximal PE 1
  • The overall incidence of venous thromboembolism in severe COVID-19 pneumonia reaches up to 27% (95% CI: 17-37%) 4

Key Risk Factors

  • Elevated D-dimer is the only consistently validated predictor of PE in COVID-19 patients 5
  • D-dimer >6 times upper limit of normal predicts thrombotic events and poor prognosis 1, 6
  • Obesity (BMI >30 kg/m²) and diabetes mellitus significantly increase PE risk 1
  • Rapid respiratory deterioration should prompt consideration of PE 1

Post-Acute Phase Risk (After Recovery)

Extended Thrombotic Window

  • The increased risk of venous thrombosis and PE persists for approximately one month after recovery from acute COVID-19 2
  • One-year follow-up data from the VA database shows significantly increased risk of pulmonary embolism compared to uninfected controls 1
  • Post-COVID-19 condition with PE predominantly affects females and those with preexisting conditions like cancer or diabetes 7

Long COVID Considerations

  • Circulatory system disruption includes increased risks of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and bleeding events as part of long COVID syndrome 1
  • The risk for thromboembolic complications in the post-acute phase is associated with the duration and severity of the hyperinflammatory state 1

Pathophysiologic Mechanisms

The heightened PE risk involves all elements of Virchow's triad 2:

  • Endothelial damage and dysfunction from direct viral injury 1, 2
  • Coagulation disorders with activation of inflammatory and thrombotic cascades 1, 8
  • Blood flow disorders from immobilization and respiratory compromise 1, 2
  • In situ pulmonary thrombosis in smaller vascular beds, not just embolic events from deep vein thrombi 8

Clinical Implications for Diagnosis

When to Suspect PE

  • Consider PE with rapid respiratory deterioration and/or high D-dimer 1
  • Chest pain in COVID-19 patients warrants PE evaluation even without traditional risk factors 3
  • Common symptoms include breathlessness and chest pain, though symptom overlap complicates diagnosis 7

Diagnostic Approach

  • CT pulmonary angiography remains the gold standard 4, 2
  • Ultrasound of lower extremity venous system can evaluate for DVT 1
  • Ventilation-perfusion lung scintigraphy may be useful when CT is contraindicated 2, 7
  • Routine screening with Doppler ultrasound or based solely on elevated D-dimer is not recommended 4

Prevention Strategies

Universal Thromboprophylaxis

  • All hospitalized COVID-19 patients should receive prophylactic anticoagulation (LMWH or UFH) unless contraindications exist 1, 4
  • Absolute contraindications include active bleeding and platelet count <25 × 10⁹/L 1, 6
  • Abnormal PT or APTT alone is not a contraindication to prophylaxis 1

Dose Escalation Considerations

  • For critically ill patients with D-dimer >6 times ULN, consider intermediate-dose LMWH (enoxaparin 40-60 mg daily or 0.5 mg/kg twice daily) 1, 6
  • Obesity (BMI >30 kg/m²) warrants intermediate-dose prophylaxis 1
  • Some protocols use therapeutic anticoagulation for D-dimer >5 mg/L with low bleeding risk 6

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not dismiss PE risk in mild COVID-19: Even patients with minimal symptoms can develop PE 3
  • Do not rely on clinical prediction rules: Traditional PE risk stratification tools may underperform in COVID-19 3
  • Do not withhold prophylaxis based on mildly elevated coagulation parameters: Only severe abnormalities are contraindications 6
  • Do not assume resolution of thrombotic risk at hospital discharge: Extended prophylaxis may be warranted given persistent risk post-recovery 2, 7
  • Monitor for both thrombosis AND bleeding: Bleeding events occur later (median 11.4 days) than thrombotic events (median 7.0 days) 9

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Patients with Mild COVID-19 Symptoms and Coincident Pulmonary Embolism: A Case Series.

Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine, 2020

Guideline

Pneumonia as a Contributing Factor to Pulmonary Thromboembolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Anticoagulation and D-dimer Monitoring in Influenza

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Post-COVID-19 Condition and Pulmonary Embolism.

Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024

Guideline

Bleeding Risk in COVID-19 Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.